It what seems to be becoming a regular occurrence, Rep. Trent Franks has decided to hold a press conference where he will once again be surrounded by a gaggle of right-wing leaders.
Just last month Franks held a press conference on the need for the Prenatal Nondiscrimination Act where he was joined by Rep. Michell Bachmann and people like Wendy Wright, Rob Schenck, and Clenard Childress.
Today, he’s participating in an anti-hate crimes press conference where he will again be joined by Wright, Harry Jackson and, of all people, Lou Sheldon:
HATE CRIMES AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
1:30 p.m. April 28, Terrace, Cannon Bldg. New
GOP Reps. Louie Gohmert of Texas and Trent Franks of Arizona hold a news conference to discuss their opposition to hate crimes legislation (HR 1913), which they say would “pose frightening threats to religious freedom.”
Agenda:
HR 1913 — Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009
Participants:
Rep. Louie Gohmert, R-Texas
Rep. Trent Franks, R-Ariz.
Harry Jackson, chairman, High Impact Leadership Coalition, and senior pastor, Hope Christian Church
Louis P. Sheldon, chairman, Traditional Values Coalition
Wendy Wright, president, Concerned Women for America,
Barrett Duke, vice president for public policy and research, Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, Southern Baptist Convention
Maureen Wiebe, legislative director, American Association of Christian Schools
This list of participants is a real doozy – just yesterday, Wright was speculating that the timing of the swine flu scare was “a political thing to push the [Kathleen] Sebelius nomination through,” and Jackson will just be coming off his role in leading the anti-marriage rally in DC today.
But it is Sheldon’s inclusion that is the real head-scratcher because, generally, members of Congress (and frankly most other leaders of the Religious Right) go out of their way not to be seen in public with the likes of him.
And given the types of things he and his organization say, it is not hard to understand why:
The main purpose of this “hate crime” legislation is to add the categories of “sexual orientation” and “gender identity,” “either actual or perceived,” as new classes of individuals receiving special protection by federal law. Sexual orientation includes heterosexuality, homosexuality, and bisexuality on an ever-expanding continuum. Will Congress also protect these sexual orientations-zoophiles, pedophiles or polygamists?
Gender identity includes such gender confused behaviors as cross-dressing, she-male, drag queen, transvestite, transsexual or transgender. Under the Act, neither “sexual orientation” or “gender identity” are really defined. How can a law be enforced if the new classes receiving special protection remain undefined?
The sexual behaviors considered sinful and immoral by most major religions will be elevated to a protected “minority” class under federal law.
Once “sexual orientation” is added to federal law, anyone with a bizarre sexual orientation will have total protection for his or her activities by claiming that Congress sanctions their appearance, behavior or attitudes.
Inevitably this will negatively affect the performance of co-workers who are forced to work alongside of individuals with bizarre sex habits. Imagine working next to a person who gets sexual pleasure from rubbing up against a woman (Fronteurism) or enjoys wearing opposite sex clothing. These are “sexual orientations.”
Apparently this is the sort of language and anti-gay militancy with which Reps. Franks and Gohmert will willingly associate themselves.
I’m just surprised that they didn’t get Mat Staver to join them because if they are rounding up anti-gay fear mongers to oppose hate crimes legislation, Staver would have fit in perfectly:
Mathew Staver, Founder of Liberty Counsel and Dean of Liberty University School of Law, commented: “Sexual orientation and gender identity include pedophilia and every imaginable deviant fetish. Cross-dressers and pedophiles find refuge in this so-called hate crimes bill, while veterans and grandmas are left to fend for themselves. Obviously, this bill is not about the prevention of crime but is all about pushing a radical sexual anarchy. This bill will crush free speech and trample free exercise of religion.”
