<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cfj-spoke-too-soon"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/883/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/883/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:57:37-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>The CFJ Spoke Too Soon</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cfj-spoke-too-soon" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/cfj-spoke-too-soon</id>
    <published>2007-01-10T08:16:44-06:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:57:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Committee for Justice" />
    <category term="Judiciary" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The  Committee for Justice was practically giddy at the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/09/ap/politics/mainD8MHUOBG7.shtml" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/09/ap/politics/mainD8MHUOBG7.shtml">announcement</a> that the White House intended to tap Fred Fielding to replace <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=19856" title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=19856">failed Supreme  Court hopeful</a> Harriet Miers as White House Counsel. &nbsp;</p>
<p>The  administration&rsquo;s decision to bring in Fielding, the CFJ <a href="http://committeeforjustice.org/cgi-data/press/files/49.shtml" title="http://committeeforjustice.org/cgi-data/press/files/49.shtml">claimed</a>,  signals to Senate Democrats that &ldquo;there&rsquo;s no point in obstructing  constitutionalist nominees in hopes of getting ones that are less objectionable  to the Left,&rdquo; which is exactly what the Right wants to hear because they <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/07/the_right_just.html" title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/07/the_right_just.html">love  nothing more</a> than fighting over the issue.</p>
<p>Unfortunately  for CFJ, just hours after they issued their press release <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Judicial-Withdrawal.html" title="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Judicial-Withdrawal.html">came  news</a> that three of the Bush administration&rsquo;s most recent and controversial  nominees are asking that their nominations be withdrawn:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In a concession to the Senate's new Democratic majority,  four of President Bush's appeals court appointees have asked to have their  nominations withdrawn, Republican officials said Tuesday.</p>
<p>These officials said that William Haynes, William Myers and  Terrence Boyle had all decided to abandon their quest for confirmation. Another  nominee, Michael Wallace, let it be known last month that he, too, had asked  Bush to withdraw his nomination. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to press reports, despite these withdrawals  President Bush &ldquo;also intends to appoint 33 other judicial nominees" - and that is just what he <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070109-6.html">has done.</a> Of  course, he can &ldquo;intend to appoint&rdquo; anyone he wants &hellip; but they aren&rsquo;t going to  get appointed until the Senate confirms them.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Given the <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=23358" title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=23358">president&rsquo;s  record</a> of needlessly provoking battles over this issue, perhaps the CFJ can  take some solace in the hope that that he will continue his tradition of  provoking confrontation, thus giving them the fight they so clearly desire.&nbsp;  &nbsp;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>The  Committee for Justice was practically giddy at the <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/09/ap/politics/mainD8MHUOBG7.shtml" title="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/01/09/ap/politics/mainD8MHUOBG7.shtml">announcement</a> that the White House intended to tap Fred Fielding to replace <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=19856" title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=19856">failed Supreme  Court hopeful</a> Harriet Miers as White House Counsel. &nbsp;</p>
<p>The  administration&rsquo;s decision to bring in Fielding, the CFJ <a href="http://committeeforjustice.org/cgi-data/press/files/49.shtml" title="http://committeeforjustice.org/cgi-data/press/files/49.shtml">claimed</a>,  signals to Senate Democrats that &ldquo;there&rsquo;s no point in obstructing  constitutionalist nominees in hopes of getting ones that are less objectionable  to the Left,&rdquo; which is exactly what the Right wants to hear because they <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/07/the_right_just.html" title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/07/the_right_just.html">love  nothing more</a> than fighting over the issue.</p>
<p>Unfortunately  for CFJ, just hours after they issued their press release <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Judicial-Withdrawal.html" title="http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/us/AP-Judicial-Withdrawal.html">came  news</a> that three of the Bush administration&rsquo;s most recent and controversial  nominees are asking that their nominations be withdrawn:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In a concession to the Senate's new Democratic majority,  four of President Bush's appeals court appointees have asked to have their  nominations withdrawn, Republican officials said Tuesday.</p>
<p>These officials said that William Haynes, William Myers and  Terrence Boyle had all decided to abandon their quest for confirmation. Another  nominee, Michael Wallace, let it be known last month that he, too, had asked  Bush to withdraw his nomination. </p>
</blockquote>
<p>According to press reports, despite these withdrawals  President Bush &ldquo;also intends to appoint 33 other judicial nominees" - and that is just what he <a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/01/20070109-6.html">has done.</a> Of  course, he can &ldquo;intend to appoint&rdquo; anyone he wants &hellip; but they aren&rsquo;t going to  get appointed until the Senate confirms them.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Given the <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=23358" title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=23358">president&rsquo;s  record</a> of needlessly provoking battles over this issue, perhaps the CFJ can  take some solace in the hope that that he will continue his tradition of  provoking confrontation, thus giving them the fight they so clearly desire.&nbsp;  &nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
