<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ohio-education-board-again-flirts-creationism"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/79/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/79/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:55:50-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Ohio Education Board Again Flirts with Creationism</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ohio-education-board-again-flirts-creationism" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/ohio-education-board-again-flirts-creationism</id>
    <published>2006-07-19T14:41:50-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:55:50-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ezra</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Education" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Members of Ohio&rsquo;s Board of Education   are again pushing the teaching of &ldquo;Intelligent Design&rdquo; creationism, as one   member <a  href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/071106education.html?UrAuth=%60N%5eNUObNUUbTTUWUXUWUZTZU%60UWUbUaUZUbUaUcTYWYWZV">proposed</a> a &ldquo;template&rdquo; for dealing with &ldquo;controversial&rdquo; topics &ndash; in <a  href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060719a.html">particular</a>,   &ldquo;global warming; evolutionary theory; emerging technologies and how they may   impact society, e.g. cloning or stem-cell research.&rdquo; Just five months ago, the   board <a  href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/15/national/15cnd-evolution.html?ex=1297659600&amp;en=b4c20e545855c59d&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">reversed</a> a biology-class mandate critical of evolution. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Members of Ohio&rsquo;s Board of Education   are again pushing the teaching of &ldquo;Intelligent Design&rdquo; creationism, as one   member <a  href="http://www.daytondailynews.com/localnews/content/localnews/daily/071106education.html?UrAuth=%60N%5eNUObNUUbTTUWUXUWUZTZU%60UWUbUaUZUbUaUcTYWYWZV">proposed</a> a &ldquo;template&rdquo; for dealing with &ldquo;controversial&rdquo; topics &ndash; in <a  href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060719a.html">particular</a>,   &ldquo;global warming; evolutionary theory; emerging technologies and how they may   impact society, e.g. cloning or stem-cell research.&rdquo; Just five months ago, the   board <a  href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/15/national/15cnd-evolution.html?ex=1297659600&amp;en=b4c20e545855c59d&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss">reversed</a> a biology-class mandate critical of evolution. </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
