<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-wing-reaction-new-york-marriage-court-case"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/43/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/43/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:55:48-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Right-Wing Reaction to New York Marriage Court Case</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-wing-reaction-new-york-marriage-court-case" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/right-wing-reaction-new-york-marriage-court-case</id>
    <published>2006-07-07T16:45:21-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:55:48-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ezra</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Anti-Gay" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;This is a good day for the   revolution,&rdquo; <a title="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060706a.html" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060706a.html">said</a> <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=8992">Traditional Values Coalition</a> spokesman James Lafferty following the decision by   New York   State&rsquo;s highest court to   end a lawsuit seeking marriage rights for same-sex couples. The Right Wing   roundly applauded the New York decision, in   which a judge cited his own &ldquo;Intuition and experience&rdquo; in matters of   child-rearing, and applauded another decision in Georgia   that a constitutional amendment was not improperly posed on the ballot. But   despite their victories, activists on the Right are still pushing for a federal   constitutional amendment. &ldquo;The only real solution will be a federal marriage   amendment because we believe there are forces that will not stop as long as   there is any chance for them to advance their agenda,&rdquo; said Rev. Bill Banuchi,   executive director of the <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=3151">Christian Coalition</a> of New York.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>&ldquo;This is a good day for the   revolution,&rdquo; <a title="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060706a.html" href="http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewCulture.asp?Page=/Culture/archive/200607/CUL20060706a.html">said</a> <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=8992">Traditional Values Coalition</a> spokesman James Lafferty following the decision by   New York   State&rsquo;s highest court to   end a lawsuit seeking marriage rights for same-sex couples. The Right Wing   roundly applauded the New York decision, in   which a judge cited his own &ldquo;Intuition and experience&rdquo; in matters of   child-rearing, and applauded another decision in Georgia   that a constitutional amendment was not improperly posed on the ballot. But   despite their victories, activists on the Right are still pushing for a federal   constitutional amendment. &ldquo;The only real solution will be a federal marriage   amendment because we believe there are forces that will not stop as long as   there is any chance for them to advance their agenda,&rdquo; said Rev. Bill Banuchi,   executive director of the <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=3151">Christian Coalition</a> of New York.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://media.pfaw.org/Right/cwa-070606x.html">American Family Association</a> told   its supporters in <a href="http://media.pfaw.org/Right/AFA_070606.txt">an e-mail</a> that &ldquo;This is a good day for pro-family folk   in New York and Georgia.</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>But   this fight is far from over. The high courts of the states of Washington,   California and New Jersey will be making decisions on the   issue of same-sex marriage, and no one knows how they'll rule. Plus, federal   judges are already getting in on the debate over marriage and family. These institutions   will never be safe until the U.S. Constitution is amended to   declare that marriage is between one man and one woman. The U.S. House of Representatives will be   taking up the Marriage Protection Act in the near future, so we'll be asking you   to contact your   congressman or congresswoman at that   time.</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>In an almost identical <a href="http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=PR06G01&amp;v=PRINT">press   release</a>, Peter Sprigg of the <a href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=4211">Family Research Council</a> said,</p>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Today, the high   courts in New York and Georgia   fulfilled their duty by upholding state laws defining marriage as the union of   one man and one woman. We applaud today's rulings, which recognize the right of   the legislature and the people to regulate marriage for the good of children and   society ... However, the only sure way to   protect the country against more rogue decisions like the one in Massachusetts   in 2003--including ones at the federal level--is through passage of a Marriage   Protection Amendment to the U.S.   Constitution.</em></p>
</blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
