<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-judges-pledge-paying-dividends"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2297/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2297/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:46-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>McCain’s Judges Pledge Paying Dividends</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-judges-pledge-paying-dividends" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-judges-pledge-paying-dividends</id>
    <published>2008-05-21T14:50:19-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:46-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="John McCain" />
    <category term="Judiciary" />
    <category term="Phyllis Schlafly" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Back when  he was running for president, Rudy Giuliani was not particularly popular with  the Religious Right, so he went out of his way to <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/07/the_last_tempta.html">promise to  deliver</a> on their most pressing issue:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/04/the_next_nomine.html">the  future of the Supreme Court</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>For its  part, the Right was torn between the idea of standing firm in its refusal to  support Giuliani and swallowing its principles for the sake of the next  Justice, with some claiming <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/the_rights_rall.html">all that mattered</a> was getting control of the Supreme Court while others insisted that they <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/the_court_is_no.html">would not be  bought off</a> with such promises. &nbsp;</p>
<p>As it  turned out, Giuliani&rsquo;s campaign quickly collapsed and the Right was spared the dilemma  of having to choose &hellip; at least when it came to Giuliani; they are now facing a  similar dilemma with John McCain. &nbsp;</p>
<p>As with  Giuliani, some right-wing leaders like James Dobson have <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/04/dobsons_dilemma.html">already declared</a> that they will not, under any circumstances, vote for McCain even though the  McCain campaign has <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html">been busy</a> working hard to <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/05/give_em_what_th.html">woo them</a> by  guaranteeing more nominees like John Roberts and Samuel Alito &hellip; and maybe even  a <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/05/mccain_bork_was.html">Robert  Bork</a> thrown in for good measure. </p>
<p>And it  looks like those efforts are starting to <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080521/NATION/522218600/0/ENTERTAINMENT">pay  off</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>Prominent conservatives and activists are indicating they  will put aside their differences with presumptive Republican presidential  nominee Sen. John McCain and rally their supporters to his side because of one  issue: federal judgeships.</p>
<p>In big gatherings and small, in e-mails and one-on-one  conversations, conservative opinion leaders fear a Democratic president,  especially Sen. Barack Obama, will use the presidential power to appoint  federal judges who will remove references to God and religious symbols from  public places.</p>
<p>They predict the incoming president likely will fill more  vacancies on the federal bench over the next four years than at any time in  recent memory, giving a Democratic administration the power to shape the courts  to reflect a liberal worldview.</p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>Federal judgeships have become the ultimate recurring  political battle. The Senate yesterday confirmed the second appeals court  nominee of the year, a far lower rate than Republicans had anticipated and  underscoring the political stakes involved. Even with Republicans in control  from 2003 through 2006 they had a difficult time getting appeals court nominees  passed in the face of Democratic filibusters.</p>
<p>Conservatives said the issue is so powerful that it could be  worth looking past what they see as Mr. McCain's other flaws. They have clashed  with the senator on issues such as his support for strict limits on campaign finance,  his teaming with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, on immigration  and his votes against President Bush's two major tax-cut packages.</p>
</blockquote>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Back when  he was running for president, Rudy Giuliani was not particularly popular with  the Religious Right, so he went out of his way to <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/07/the_last_tempta.html">promise to  deliver</a> on their most pressing issue:&nbsp; <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/04/the_next_nomine.html">the  future of the Supreme Court</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>For its  part, the Right was torn between the idea of standing firm in its refusal to  support Giuliani and swallowing its principles for the sake of the next  Justice, with some claiming <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/the_rights_rall.html">all that mattered</a> was getting control of the Supreme Court while others insisted that they <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/the_court_is_no.html">would not be  bought off</a> with such promises. &nbsp;</p>
<p>As it  turned out, Giuliani&rsquo;s campaign quickly collapsed and the Right was spared the dilemma  of having to choose &hellip; at least when it came to Giuliani; they are now facing a  similar dilemma with John McCain. &nbsp;</p>
<p>As with  Giuliani, some right-wing leaders like James Dobson have <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/04/dobsons_dilemma.html">already declared</a> that they will not, under any circumstances, vote for McCain even though the  McCain campaign has <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html">been busy</a> working hard to <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/05/give_em_what_th.html">woo them</a> by  guaranteeing more nominees like John Roberts and Samuel Alito &hellip; and maybe even  a <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/05/mccain_bork_was.html">Robert  Bork</a> thrown in for good measure. </p>
<p>And it  looks like those efforts are starting to <a href="http://washingtontimes.com/article/20080521/NATION/522218600/0/ENTERTAINMENT">pay  off</a>: </p>
<blockquote><p>Prominent conservatives and activists are indicating they  will put aside their differences with presumptive Republican presidential  nominee Sen. John McCain and rally their supporters to his side because of one  issue: federal judgeships.</p>
<p>In big gatherings and small, in e-mails and one-on-one  conversations, conservative opinion leaders fear a Democratic president,  especially Sen. Barack Obama, will use the presidential power to appoint  federal judges who will remove references to God and religious symbols from  public places.</p>
<p>They predict the incoming president likely will fill more  vacancies on the federal bench over the next four years than at any time in  recent memory, giving a Democratic administration the power to shape the courts  to reflect a liberal worldview.</p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>Federal judgeships have become the ultimate recurring  political battle. The Senate yesterday confirmed the second appeals court  nominee of the year, a far lower rate than Republicans had anticipated and  underscoring the political stakes involved. Even with Republicans in control  from 2003 through 2006 they had a difficult time getting appeals court nominees  passed in the face of Democratic filibusters.</p>
<p>Conservatives said the issue is so powerful that it could be  worth looking past what they see as Mr. McCain's other flaws. They have clashed  with the senator on issues such as his support for strict limits on campaign finance,  his teaming with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts Democrat, on immigration  and his votes against President Bush's two major tax-cut packages.</p>
</blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
