<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/they-are-just-not-you"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2286/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2286/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:45-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>They Are Just Not That Into You</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/they-are-just-not-you" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/they-are-just-not-you</id>
    <published>2008-05-16T14:33:06-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:45-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Religious Right" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ever since  Republicans were thumped in the 2006 election, the Right has been telling  anyone who will listen that the GOP&rsquo;s woes can be <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/11/spinning_themse_1.html">attributed  to the fact</a> that Republicans have been insufficiently faithful to the  Religious Right&rsquo;s agenda.&nbsp; Since then,  the GOP&rsquo;s fortunes have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/us/politics/15repubs.html">continued to  fade</a> and so desperate are they to stop the bleeding heading into November that  they&rsquo;ve adopted a nearly unprecedented strategy of <a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000002877683">distancing  themselves</a> from their right-wing base:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Something big is missing from House Republicans&rsquo; 2008  campaign agenda for American families, and that is no accident.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s not a single mention in the 47-point program of such  red-meat GOP issues as banning abortion, outlawing same-sex marriage, allowing  prayer in the public schools, banning flag burning and protecting the Pledge of  Allegiance. Instead, the plan focuses on Republican-introduced ideas as  allowing private sector workers to take compensatory time instead of premium  pay for overtime worked (HR 6025) or permitting full tax deductibility for most  medical expenses (HR 636).</p>
<p>In an effort to appeal to moderates in their uphill push to  retake the House, Republicans have pushed divisive social issues off center  stage and replaced them with a host of pocketbook items they hope will appeal  to working women, moderates and even some Democrats.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course,  the GOP wants it known that just because it is too embarrassed to be seen  publicly with the Religious Right and fears that its narrow agenda is a drag on  Republicans&rsquo; own electoral chances, that doesn&rsquo;t mean they don&rsquo;t still love  them:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rep. Joe Pitts , R-Pa., head of the House Republicans&rsquo;  70-member Values Action Team, said he wasn&rsquo;t concerned by the omission of  social issues from the House GOP platform. &ldquo;I have no assurance from the  leaders about this. But I know the leaders and I know that when we come out  with the whole big picture, these are all things we will stand for,&rsquo;&rsquo; Pitts  said. </p></blockquote>
<p>Considering  that one of the Right&rsquo;s standard complaints is that Republicans court them in  election years and then more or less ignore their agenda once in office, it&rsquo;s  hard to see how also ignoring them at election time is going to be a winning  strategy for the GOP.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Ever since  Republicans were thumped in the 2006 election, the Right has been telling  anyone who will listen that the GOP&rsquo;s woes can be <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/11/spinning_themse_1.html">attributed  to the fact</a> that Republicans have been insufficiently faithful to the  Religious Right&rsquo;s agenda.&nbsp; Since then,  the GOP&rsquo;s fortunes have <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/05/15/us/politics/15repubs.html">continued to  fade</a> and so desperate are they to stop the bleeding heading into November that  they&rsquo;ve adopted a nearly unprecedented strategy of <a href="http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmspage.cfm?docid=news-000002877683">distancing  themselves</a> from their right-wing base:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Something big is missing from House Republicans&rsquo; 2008  campaign agenda for American families, and that is no accident.</p>
<p>There&rsquo;s not a single mention in the 47-point program of such  red-meat GOP issues as banning abortion, outlawing same-sex marriage, allowing  prayer in the public schools, banning flag burning and protecting the Pledge of  Allegiance. Instead, the plan focuses on Republican-introduced ideas as  allowing private sector workers to take compensatory time instead of premium  pay for overtime worked (HR 6025) or permitting full tax deductibility for most  medical expenses (HR 636).</p>
<p>In an effort to appeal to moderates in their uphill push to  retake the House, Republicans have pushed divisive social issues off center  stage and replaced them with a host of pocketbook items they hope will appeal  to working women, moderates and even some Democrats.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course,  the GOP wants it known that just because it is too embarrassed to be seen  publicly with the Religious Right and fears that its narrow agenda is a drag on  Republicans&rsquo; own electoral chances, that doesn&rsquo;t mean they don&rsquo;t still love  them:</p>
<blockquote><p>Rep. Joe Pitts , R-Pa., head of the House Republicans&rsquo;  70-member Values Action Team, said he wasn&rsquo;t concerned by the omission of  social issues from the House GOP platform. &ldquo;I have no assurance from the  leaders about this. But I know the leaders and I know that when we come out  with the whole big picture, these are all things we will stand for,&rsquo;&rsquo; Pitts  said. </p></blockquote>
<p>Considering  that one of the Right&rsquo;s standard complaints is that Republicans court them in  election years and then more or less ignore their agenda once in office, it&rsquo;s  hard to see how also ignoring them at election time is going to be a winning  strategy for the GOP.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
