<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/give-%E2%80%98em-what-they-want-john"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2262/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2262/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:44-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Give ‘Em What They Want, John</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/give-%E2%80%98em-what-they-want-john" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/give-%E2%80%98em-what-they-want-john</id>
    <published>2008-05-06T08:53:29-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:44-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Family Research Council" />
    <category term="John McCain" />
    <category term="John Roberts" />
    <category term="Judiciary" />
    <category term="Manuel Miranda" />
    <category term="Paul Weyrich" />
    <category term="Samuel Alito" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As John  McCain prepares to deliver <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDcwM2MzNjY2MGVmMjc0NDI5YmFhYTRjMDQ1NjEzM2U=">his  remarks</a> on the future of the judiciary today in North Carolina, it looks like he will be  under some close scrutiny from the Right, who are <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121003412446368775.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">growing  fed up</a> with his seeming reluctance to throw them red meat:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In town-hall meetings, Sen. McCain makes a point to explain  his positions on terrorism, taxes, the economy, energy and health care. But in  his prepared remarks, he never mentions abortion, same-sex marriage, judges or  gun rights. When asked, he often responds quickly and moves on.</p>
<p>&quot;Imagine if you were an economic conservative and  someone never talked about tax policy unless they were asked about it,&quot;  said Charmaine Yoest, a vice president at the Family Research Council, a  conservative advocacy group focused on social issues.</p>
<p>Asked whether she thinks Sen. McCain really cares about the  abortion issue, she said, &quot;I don't know, and that's his problem.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As such,  many of them are <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/mccain-courts-right-wing-2008-05-05.html">launching  a campaign</a> to make the issue of judges a centerpiece of the upcoming  election: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Conservative leaders also want the party to embrace language  that would instruct Senate leaders to make the confirmation of nominees a  higher priority. Conservatives say Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell  (R-Ky.) must press Democrats harder to confirm several controversial nominees,  such as D.C. Circuit Court nominee Peter Keisler and 4th Circuit Court nominee  Robert Conrad Jr. </p>
<p>Manuel Miranda, a former aide to ex-Senate Majority Leader  Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), circulated a draft Monday of principles for the GOP  platform committee to consider. Several conservative leaders quickly endorsed  it.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Paul Weyrich, chairman of the conservative Free Congress  Foundation, said he supports including the language on judicial nominees in the  party platform.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I think the more we particularize that whole issue, the  more people focus on the topic,&rdquo; Weyrich said. Making detailed guidelines on  judicial nominees part of the platform would also help social conservatives  hold McCain to account if he is elected president. </p>
<p>&ldquo;You can compare what the party says with any subsequent  action by its nominees,&rdquo; said Weyrich.&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And while  McCain is delivering his remarks, Republican National Committee officials will  be courting right-wing leaders on this effort having &ldquo;invited social  conservative leaders based in and around Washington,   D.C., to attend a meeting Tuesday  morning where former Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) will give them a preview of  McCain&rsquo;s remarks.&rdquo;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<p>Already  McCain surrogate Sen. Sam Brownback is <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzA1MmM2OTNjYmVjNmFkMzVmNGQwNDRjOWRkYjNjM2Q">making  the rounds</a> assuring the Right that it&rsquo;ll like what it hears and, judging by <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDcwM2MzNjY2MGVmMjc0NDI5YmFhYTRjMDQ1NjEzM2U=">excerpts  of McCain's remarks</a> and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0643163920080506">preliminary  press coverage</a>, it certainly looks like that will be the case: &nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Republican presidential candidate John McCain said on  Tuesday he would appoint judges in the mold of conservatives John Roberts,  Samuel Alito and former Chief Justice William Rehnquist if he were elected in  November.</p>
<p>In an excerpt from a speech McCain was to give in Winston-Salem on Tuesday, the Arizona senator said he would &quot;look for  accomplished men and women with a proven record of excellence in the law, and a  proven commitment to judicial restraint.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I will look for people in the cast of John Roberts,  Samuel Alito, and my friend the late William Rehnquist -- jurists of the  highest caliber who know their own minds, and know the law, and know the  difference,&quot; McCain said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In fact, so  sure is the McCain camp that this speech will win over the Right that it is reaching  out to them via GOPUSA <a href="http://media.pfaw.org/Right/John%20McCain%20The%20Future%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.htm">seeking  donations</a>:&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We have a lot at stake in this presidential election. As a  nation, we face many challenges that will require real leadership from our next  president. I have said before that this election will be about the big things,  not the small things, and I write to you today about one big issue in  particular - the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. If one of my Democratic  opponents is elected in November, you can rest assured that given the  opportunity to appoint judges, they will appoint those who make law with disregard  for the will of the people.</p>
<p>There may be at least two vacancies on the United States  Supreme Court during the next presidential term. As president, I will ensure  that only those judges with a strict interpretation of the Constitution of the United States  are appointed. I will nominate judges who understand that their role is to  faithfully apply the law as written, not impose their opinions through judicial  fiat.</p>
<p>If you want judges who have a clear, complete adherence to  the Constitution of the United    States and who do not legislate from the  bench to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, then I ask that you join my campaign  for president today by making a financial contribution.</p>
</blockquote>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As John  McCain prepares to deliver <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDcwM2MzNjY2MGVmMjc0NDI5YmFhYTRjMDQ1NjEzM2U=">his  remarks</a> on the future of the judiciary today in North Carolina, it looks like he will be  under some close scrutiny from the Right, who are <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121003412446368775.html?mod=googlenews_wsj">growing  fed up</a> with his seeming reluctance to throw them red meat:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>In town-hall meetings, Sen. McCain makes a point to explain  his positions on terrorism, taxes, the economy, energy and health care. But in  his prepared remarks, he never mentions abortion, same-sex marriage, judges or  gun rights. When asked, he often responds quickly and moves on.</p>
<p>&quot;Imagine if you were an economic conservative and  someone never talked about tax policy unless they were asked about it,&quot;  said Charmaine Yoest, a vice president at the Family Research Council, a  conservative advocacy group focused on social issues.</p>
<p>Asked whether she thinks Sen. McCain really cares about the  abortion issue, she said, &quot;I don't know, and that's his problem.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As such,  many of them are <a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/mccain-courts-right-wing-2008-05-05.html">launching  a campaign</a> to make the issue of judges a centerpiece of the upcoming  election: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>Conservative leaders also want the party to embrace language  that would instruct Senate leaders to make the confirmation of nominees a  higher priority. Conservatives say Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell  (R-Ky.) must press Democrats harder to confirm several controversial nominees,  such as D.C. Circuit Court nominee Peter Keisler and 4th Circuit Court nominee  Robert Conrad Jr. </p>
<p>Manuel Miranda, a former aide to ex-Senate Majority Leader  Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), circulated a draft Monday of principles for the GOP  platform committee to consider. Several conservative leaders quickly endorsed  it.&nbsp; </p>
<p>Paul Weyrich, chairman of the conservative Free Congress  Foundation, said he supports including the language on judicial nominees in the  party platform.</p>
<p>&ldquo;I think the more we particularize that whole issue, the  more people focus on the topic,&rdquo; Weyrich said. Making detailed guidelines on  judicial nominees part of the platform would also help social conservatives  hold McCain to account if he is elected president. </p>
<p>&ldquo;You can compare what the party says with any subsequent  action by its nominees,&rdquo; said Weyrich.&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>And while  McCain is delivering his remarks, Republican National Committee officials will  be courting right-wing leaders on this effort having &ldquo;invited social  conservative leaders based in and around Washington,   D.C., to attend a meeting Tuesday  morning where former Sen. Dan Coats (R-Ind.) will give them a preview of  McCain&rsquo;s remarks.&rdquo;&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<p>Already  McCain surrogate Sen. Sam Brownback is <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzA1MmM2OTNjYmVjNmFkMzVmNGQwNDRjOWRkYjNjM2Q">making  the rounds</a> assuring the Right that it&rsquo;ll like what it hears and, judging by <a href="http://campaignspot.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDcwM2MzNjY2MGVmMjc0NDI5YmFhYTRjMDQ1NjEzM2U=">excerpts  of McCain's remarks</a> and <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/politicsNews/idUSN0643163920080506">preliminary  press coverage</a>, it certainly looks like that will be the case: &nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Republican presidential candidate John McCain said on  Tuesday he would appoint judges in the mold of conservatives John Roberts,  Samuel Alito and former Chief Justice William Rehnquist if he were elected in  November.</p>
<p>In an excerpt from a speech McCain was to give in Winston-Salem on Tuesday, the Arizona senator said he would &quot;look for  accomplished men and women with a proven record of excellence in the law, and a  proven commitment to judicial restraint.&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;I will look for people in the cast of John Roberts,  Samuel Alito, and my friend the late William Rehnquist -- jurists of the  highest caliber who know their own minds, and know the law, and know the  difference,&quot; McCain said.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>In fact, so  sure is the McCain camp that this speech will win over the Right that it is reaching  out to them via GOPUSA <a href="http://media.pfaw.org/Right/John%20McCain%20The%20Future%20of%20the%20Supreme%20Court.htm">seeking  donations</a>:&nbsp; &nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>We have a lot at stake in this presidential election. As a  nation, we face many challenges that will require real leadership from our next  president. I have said before that this election will be about the big things,  not the small things, and I write to you today about one big issue in  particular - the future of the U.S. Supreme Court. If one of my Democratic  opponents is elected in November, you can rest assured that given the  opportunity to appoint judges, they will appoint those who make law with disregard  for the will of the people.</p>
<p>There may be at least two vacancies on the United States  Supreme Court during the next presidential term. As president, I will ensure  that only those judges with a strict interpretation of the Constitution of the United States  are appointed. I will nominate judges who understand that their role is to  faithfully apply the law as written, not impose their opinions through judicial  fiat.</p>
<p>If you want judges who have a clear, complete adherence to  the Constitution of the United    States and who do not legislate from the  bench to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court, then I ask that you join my campaign  for president today by making a financial contribution.</p>
</blockquote>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
