<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-secret-speech"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2202/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/2202/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:40-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>McCain’s Secret Speech</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-secret-speech" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/mccain%E2%80%99s-secret-speech</id>
    <published>2008-03-26T16:03:45-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T16:00:40-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Anti-Gay" />
    <category term="Council for National Policy" />
    <category term="John McCain" />
    <category term="Judiciary" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Right Wing" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It is no  secret that John McCain prides himself on being a straight-talkin&rsquo; maverick and  that the media eats it up, which is why his cozying up to the likes of <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/03/double_standard.html">Rod Parsley</a> and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/the_maverick_an.html">John  Hagee</a> received <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250012?f=h_top">so  little coverage</a>.&nbsp; For that matter, it is probably also why McCain&rsquo;s  recent speech to the Council for National Policy received so little attention  &nbsp;&hellip; well, that and the fact that the CNP is <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/03/mccain_courts_t.html">notoriously  secretive</a> and limited press access to his address.&nbsp; </p>
<p>But now,  several weeks after the event and with absolutely no fanfare, the CNP quietly  posted a <a href="http://www.policycounsel.org/66513/66445.html">transcript of  his remarks</a> on their threadbare website and while McCain would most  certainly deny that he addressed the gathering with any attempt to pander for  their votes, he certainly did a lot of telling them what they wanted to hear.  &nbsp;</p>
<p>McCain  offered up a litany of issues the Right cares about on which he completely  shares their views: federal spending (too high), taxes (bad), dependence on  foreign oil (also bad), the border (too porous), Iraq (a success) and, most  importantly, judges: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I want to just mention a couple other things with you very  briefly.&nbsp; Judges.&nbsp; I am proud to have played a role in the  appointment of two of the finest judges I think that may have ever been  appointed to the United States Supreme Court in Justices Alito and Roberts.</p>
<p>I commit to you, as I have for many years, I will appoint,  nominate Judges to the United States  Supreme Court who strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States and do not legislate  from the bench.&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>McCain then  opened the floor to questions and assured those in attendance that he intends  to use his campaign to &ldquo;articulate a strong and conservative vision for the  future of this country&rdquo; and bring the party together.&nbsp; He also reiterated  his pledge to secure the borders, defeat terrorism, fight the Fairness  Doctrine, control health care costs, and &ldquo;change the culture in America  to respect the rights of the unborn.&rdquo; &nbsp;He also promised to throw his  weight behind efforts to prevent gays and lesbians from being treated equally  when it comes to marriage: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>ATTENDEE:&nbsp; Senator, we are from Ohio, and in 2004, many say that the  marriage amendment made the difference for Bush. This coming election, you are  going to have - Florida  is already on the ballot.&nbsp; Arizona is  more than likely going to be on the ballot, and California.&nbsp; Will you openly support  the marriage amendments in those three States?</p>
<p>SENATOR McCAIN:&nbsp; Yes, sir.&nbsp; And as I say, I am  proud to have been the honorary chairman of our effort last time, which was  narrowly defeated, as you know, because there was a misinterpretation of the  language, and we are going to clear that up.&nbsp; I think we can win it this  time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>McCain&rsquo;s  &ldquo;straight talk&rdquo; reputation is based, at least implicitly, on the assumption  that he tells it like it is and won&rsquo;t hesitate to tell audiences things they  might not want to hear. &nbsp;But so far in this campaign, McCain has addressed  three purely right-wing audiences (the CNP, the <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/candidates_curr.html" title="blocked::http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/candidates_curr.html">Values  Voter Summit</a>, and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html" title="blocked::http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html">CPAC</a>)  and each time he has used the opportunity not to demonstrate his &ldquo;maverick&rdquo;  ways but to humbly seek their support by constantly reminding them of the  principles and positions they share, touting his conservative record, and all around telling them what they want to hear. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It is no  secret that John McCain prides himself on being a straight-talkin&rsquo; maverick and  that the media eats it up, which is why his cozying up to the likes of <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/03/double_standard.html">Rod Parsley</a> and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/the_maverick_an.html">John  Hagee</a> received <a href="http://mediamatters.org/items/200803250012?f=h_top">so  little coverage</a>.&nbsp; For that matter, it is probably also why McCain&rsquo;s  recent speech to the Council for National Policy received so little attention  &nbsp;&hellip; well, that and the fact that the CNP is <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/03/mccain_courts_t.html">notoriously  secretive</a> and limited press access to his address.&nbsp; </p>
<p>But now,  several weeks after the event and with absolutely no fanfare, the CNP quietly  posted a <a href="http://www.policycounsel.org/66513/66445.html">transcript of  his remarks</a> on their threadbare website and while McCain would most  certainly deny that he addressed the gathering with any attempt to pander for  their votes, he certainly did a lot of telling them what they wanted to hear.  &nbsp;</p>
<p>McCain  offered up a litany of issues the Right cares about on which he completely  shares their views: federal spending (too high), taxes (bad), dependence on  foreign oil (also bad), the border (too porous), Iraq (a success) and, most  importantly, judges: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>I want to just mention a couple other things with you very  briefly.&nbsp; Judges.&nbsp; I am proud to have played a role in the  appointment of two of the finest judges I think that may have ever been  appointed to the United States Supreme Court in Justices Alito and Roberts.</p>
<p>I commit to you, as I have for many years, I will appoint,  nominate Judges to the United States  Supreme Court who strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States and do not legislate  from the bench.&nbsp; </p>
</blockquote>
<p>McCain then  opened the floor to questions and assured those in attendance that he intends  to use his campaign to &ldquo;articulate a strong and conservative vision for the  future of this country&rdquo; and bring the party together.&nbsp; He also reiterated  his pledge to secure the borders, defeat terrorism, fight the Fairness  Doctrine, control health care costs, and &ldquo;change the culture in America  to respect the rights of the unborn.&rdquo; &nbsp;He also promised to throw his  weight behind efforts to prevent gays and lesbians from being treated equally  when it comes to marriage: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>ATTENDEE:&nbsp; Senator, we are from Ohio, and in 2004, many say that the  marriage amendment made the difference for Bush. This coming election, you are  going to have - Florida  is already on the ballot.&nbsp; Arizona is  more than likely going to be on the ballot, and California.&nbsp; Will you openly support  the marriage amendments in those three States?</p>
<p>SENATOR McCAIN:&nbsp; Yes, sir.&nbsp; And as I say, I am  proud to have been the honorary chairman of our effort last time, which was  narrowly defeated, as you know, because there was a misinterpretation of the  language, and we are going to clear that up.&nbsp; I think we can win it this  time.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>McCain&rsquo;s  &ldquo;straight talk&rdquo; reputation is based, at least implicitly, on the assumption  that he tells it like it is and won&rsquo;t hesitate to tell audiences things they  might not want to hear. &nbsp;But so far in this campaign, McCain has addressed  three purely right-wing audiences (the CNP, the <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/candidates_curr.html" title="blocked::http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/10/candidates_curr.html">Values  Voter Summit</a>, and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html" title="blocked::http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2008/02/no_straight_tal.html">CPAC</a>)  and each time he has used the opportunity not to demonstrate his &ldquo;maverick&rdquo;  ways but to humbly seek their support by constantly reminding them of the  principles and positions they share, touting his conservative record, and all around telling them what they want to hear. </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
