<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frcs-perkins-suggests-romney-better-huckabee-religious-right-issues"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1801/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1801/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:59:26-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>FRC&#039;s Perkins Suggests Romney Better Than Huckabee on Religious-Right Issues</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frcs-perkins-suggests-romney-better-huckabee-religious-right-issues" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frcs-perkins-suggests-romney-better-huckabee-religious-right-issues</id>
    <published>2007-10-10T12:41:25-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:59:26-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ezra</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Alan Keyes" />
    <category term="Family Research Council" />
    <category term="Mike Huckabee" />
    <category term="Mitt Romney" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Tony Perkins" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In a press call this morning, Family   Research Council President Tony Perkins downplayed recent talk about   religious-right leaders threatening to bolt the GOP for a third-party   presidential candidate. Perkins, promoting FRC&rsquo;s Values Voter Summit in   Washington   next weekend, said he was &ldquo;optimistic&rdquo; that the GOP field would &ldquo;solidify&rdquo; and a   candidate acceptable to the Right would emerge out of the conference&rsquo;s straw   poll.</p>
<p>Rudy Giuliani&rsquo;s decision to   participate in the FRC event threatens to deflate this optimism, however. If   Giuliani gets significant support from among the FRC members participating in   the straw poll&mdash;as he has from among the national constituency these leaders   claims to represent&mdash;then the threats by James Dobson and others to spoil the   election could fall flat. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not saying he won&rsquo;t get <em>some</em> social conservative support,&rdquo;   cautioned Perkins, &ldquo;but some social conservative support is not enough to win.&rdquo;   Despite Perkins&rsquo; claim that Giuliani will receive a &ldquo;cordial&rdquo; reception, we can   expect many speakers&mdash;not just other candidates&mdash;to directly or indirectly attack,   in Perkins&rsquo; phrase, &ldquo;the pro-abortion rights   candidate.&rdquo;</p>
<p>And while some right-wing activists   are hoping that the Religious Right will coalesce around one of their   second-tier favorites&mdash;such as Mike Huckabee&mdash;Perkins seemed to downplay that   option, panning them as unacceptable to economic- and foreign policy-oriented   Republicans. In fact, Perkins spoke glowingly of Mitt Romney, saying that &ldquo;in my   opinion, [he&rsquo;s] the strongest on these core social issues&rdquo;&mdash;and not only that,   but his &ldquo;conversion&rdquo; on wedge issues has been &ldquo;genuine.&rdquo; In fact, Perkins said   Romney is stronger than Huckabee and the others on such issues. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>During the campaign cycle, he has   made these issues more front-and-center in his message than I think other   candidates who are social conservatives have, I mean that have a track record of   social conservatism. I think he has staked out ground on these issues so much so   that he would have a very difficult time ever backing away from them; he would   lose all credibility. He has really brought emphasis to these issues. And I do   think, yes, more than Mike Huckabee and some of the   others.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Alan Keyes can&rsquo;t get no   respect. Despite his <a title="http://discuss.alankeyes.com/calendar.php" href="http://discuss.alankeyes.com/calendar.php">wide-open schedule</a>, he&rsquo;s   not on the <a title="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08" href="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08">list of   speakers</a> at the Values Voter Summit; nevertheless, FRC&rsquo;s Charmaine Yoest   declared that &ldquo;we have all of the major GOP   candidates.&rdquo;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>In a press call this morning, Family   Research Council President Tony Perkins downplayed recent talk about   religious-right leaders threatening to bolt the GOP for a third-party   presidential candidate. Perkins, promoting FRC&rsquo;s Values Voter Summit in   Washington   next weekend, said he was &ldquo;optimistic&rdquo; that the GOP field would &ldquo;solidify&rdquo; and a   candidate acceptable to the Right would emerge out of the conference&rsquo;s straw   poll.</p>
<p>Rudy Giuliani&rsquo;s decision to   participate in the FRC event threatens to deflate this optimism, however. If   Giuliani gets significant support from among the FRC members participating in   the straw poll&mdash;as he has from among the national constituency these leaders   claims to represent&mdash;then the threats by James Dobson and others to spoil the   election could fall flat. &ldquo;I&rsquo;m not saying he won&rsquo;t get <em>some</em> social conservative support,&rdquo;   cautioned Perkins, &ldquo;but some social conservative support is not enough to win.&rdquo;   Despite Perkins&rsquo; claim that Giuliani will receive a &ldquo;cordial&rdquo; reception, we can   expect many speakers&mdash;not just other candidates&mdash;to directly or indirectly attack,   in Perkins&rsquo; phrase, &ldquo;the pro-abortion rights   candidate.&rdquo;</p>
<p>And while some right-wing activists   are hoping that the Religious Right will coalesce around one of their   second-tier favorites&mdash;such as Mike Huckabee&mdash;Perkins seemed to downplay that   option, panning them as unacceptable to economic- and foreign policy-oriented   Republicans. In fact, Perkins spoke glowingly of Mitt Romney, saying that &ldquo;in my   opinion, [he&rsquo;s] the strongest on these core social issues&rdquo;&mdash;and not only that,   but his &ldquo;conversion&rdquo; on wedge issues has been &ldquo;genuine.&rdquo; In fact, Perkins said   Romney is stronger than Huckabee and the others on such issues. </p>
<blockquote>
<p>During the campaign cycle, he has   made these issues more front-and-center in his message than I think other   candidates who are social conservatives have, I mean that have a track record of   social conservatism. I think he has staked out ground on these issues so much so   that he would have a very difficult time ever backing away from them; he would   lose all credibility. He has really brought emphasis to these issues. And I do   think, yes, more than Mike Huckabee and some of the   others.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Meanwhile, Alan Keyes can&rsquo;t get no   respect. Despite his <a title="http://discuss.alankeyes.com/calendar.php" href="http://discuss.alankeyes.com/calendar.php">wide-open schedule</a>, he&rsquo;s   not on the <a title="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08" href="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08">list of   speakers</a> at the Values Voter Summit; nevertheless, FRC&rsquo;s Charmaine Yoest   declared that &ldquo;we have all of the major GOP   candidates.&rdquo;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
