<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/thompson-sets-dobson-land-war"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1751/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1751/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:59:23-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>Thompson Sets Off a Dobson-Land War</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/thompson-sets-dobson-land-war" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/thompson-sets-dobson-land-war</id>
    <published>2007-09-25T10:06:30-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:59:23-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Focus on the Family" />
    <category term="Fred Thompson" />
    <category term="James Dobson" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <category term="Religious Right" />
    <category term="Richard Land" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Several  months ago we <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/04/is_richard_land.html">noted</a> that Richard Land was trying to position himself as a key player within the  Religious Right hierarchy and had been publicly challenging James Dobson on a  variety of fronts, including immigration, global warming and, most importantly,  the candidacy of Fred Thompson.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/07/does_gushing_co.html">From the  get-go</a>, Land has been a vocal advocate of Thompson, issuing fawning praise  of him at every opportunity &ndash; so it must have come as a rude surprise when,  last week, Dobson weighed in and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/09/catch_a_falling.html">declared  Thompson unacceptable</a>: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>In a private e-mail obtained Wednesday by The Associated  Press, Dobson accuses the former Tennessee  senator and actor of being weak on the campaign trail and wrong on issues dear  to social conservatives.</p>
<p>&quot;Isn't Thompson the candidate who is opposed to a  Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, believes there should be 50  different definitions of marriage in the U.S., favors McCain-Feingold, won't  talk at all about what he believes, and can't speak his way out of a paper bag  on the campaign trail?&quot; Dobson wrote. &quot;He has no passion, no zeal and  no apparent 'want to.' And yet he is apparently the Great Hope that burns in  the breasts of many conservative Christians? Well, not for me, my brothers. Not  for me!&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Obviously, this didn&rsquo;t sit well with Land, so it is  not surprising that he has decided to strike back, reaching out to <a href="http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/237627.aspx">CBN&rsquo;s David Brody</a> to defend  Thompson and blast Dobson:</p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve received phone calls and emails from Southern Baptists  about Senator Thompson. They are all furious at Doctor Dobson. They just feel  that first of all there was a mischaracterizing of his positions. Do I wish  that he supported the marriage protection amendment? Of course I do.&nbsp; To  say that he is for 50 different views of marriage in 50 different states is a  gross mischaracterization of his position. Secondly, do I wish that he attended  church every Sunday? As a Baptist pastor, of course I do. But does that make  him a person of unbelief? That&rsquo;s harsh and unwarranted.&rdquo;</p></blockquote>
<p>Land defends Thompson&rsquo;s opposition to a marriage amendment  by claiming that Thompson is simply so principled that he will not jettison his  staunch &ldquo;federalist&rdquo; convictions for political gain, before winding it up by  proclaiming that Thompson is &ldquo;one of us&rdquo;:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;Fred Thompson grew up in a very modest means in a small  town in America just like  Ronald Reagan grew up in very modest means in a small town in Illinois. You acquire not only an  understanding of but a respect for everyday folk when you come from the  background that you don&rsquo;t get otherwise and people sense it. That this is a guy  who respects me, a guy who understands that we are the backbone of this  country, we are the salt of the Earth and he not only understands us, he&rsquo;s one  of us. He&rsquo;s a successful one of us but he&rsquo;s one of us and they trust a guy like  that. They give a guy like that a larger margin of error. Nobody gets everything  right but its core values. My assessment is that this guy is a whole much like  Reagan including his Teflon quality. The press has been beating up with him for  these types of gaffes and he continues to climb in the polls.&rdquo;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is exceedingly rare that anyone on the Right dares to  criticize Dobson, much less do so publicly. &nbsp;In fact, the last people to  do so ended up getting <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/06/thou_shall_not.html">booted out of  the movement</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>This sort of high-profile fight cannot be helping the Right  as it struggles to figure out how to maintain its influence going into the 2008  election.&nbsp; But at least it ought to make the upcoming Values Voter Summit  all the more interesting, since both Land and Dobson are <a href="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08">going  to be there</a>. &nbsp;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>Several  months ago we <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/04/is_richard_land.html">noted</a> that Richard Land was trying to position himself as a key player within the  Religious Right hierarchy and had been publicly challenging James Dobson on a  variety of fronts, including immigration, global warming and, most importantly,  the candidacy of Fred Thompson.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/07/does_gushing_co.html">From the  get-go</a>, Land has been a vocal advocate of Thompson, issuing fawning praise  of him at every opportunity &ndash; so it must have come as a rude surprise when,  last week, Dobson weighed in and <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/09/catch_a_falling.html">declared  Thompson unacceptable</a>: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>In a private e-mail obtained Wednesday by The Associated  Press, Dobson accuses the former Tennessee  senator and actor of being weak on the campaign trail and wrong on issues dear  to social conservatives.</p>
<p>&quot;Isn't Thompson the candidate who is opposed to a  Constitutional amendment to protect marriage, believes there should be 50  different definitions of marriage in the U.S., favors McCain-Feingold, won't  talk at all about what he believes, and can't speak his way out of a paper bag  on the campaign trail?&quot; Dobson wrote. &quot;He has no passion, no zeal and  no apparent 'want to.' And yet he is apparently the Great Hope that burns in  the breasts of many conservative Christians? Well, not for me, my brothers. Not  for me!&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Obviously, this didn&rsquo;t sit well with Land, so it is  not surprising that he has decided to strike back, reaching out to <a href="http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/237627.aspx">CBN&rsquo;s David Brody</a> to defend  Thompson and blast Dobson:</p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;I&rsquo;ve received phone calls and emails from Southern Baptists  about Senator Thompson. They are all furious at Doctor Dobson. They just feel  that first of all there was a mischaracterizing of his positions. Do I wish  that he supported the marriage protection amendment? Of course I do.&nbsp; To  say that he is for 50 different views of marriage in 50 different states is a  gross mischaracterization of his position. Secondly, do I wish that he attended  church every Sunday? As a Baptist pastor, of course I do. But does that make  him a person of unbelief? That&rsquo;s harsh and unwarranted.&rdquo;</p></blockquote>
<p>Land defends Thompson&rsquo;s opposition to a marriage amendment  by claiming that Thompson is simply so principled that he will not jettison his  staunch &ldquo;federalist&rdquo; convictions for political gain, before winding it up by  proclaiming that Thompson is &ldquo;one of us&rdquo;:&nbsp; </p>
<blockquote><p>&ldquo;Fred Thompson grew up in a very modest means in a small  town in America just like  Ronald Reagan grew up in very modest means in a small town in Illinois. You acquire not only an  understanding of but a respect for everyday folk when you come from the  background that you don&rsquo;t get otherwise and people sense it. That this is a guy  who respects me, a guy who understands that we are the backbone of this  country, we are the salt of the Earth and he not only understands us, he&rsquo;s one  of us. He&rsquo;s a successful one of us but he&rsquo;s one of us and they trust a guy like  that. They give a guy like that a larger margin of error. Nobody gets everything  right but its core values. My assessment is that this guy is a whole much like  Reagan including his Teflon quality. The press has been beating up with him for  these types of gaffes and he continues to climb in the polls.&rdquo;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is exceedingly rare that anyone on the Right dares to  criticize Dobson, much less do so publicly. &nbsp;In fact, the last people to  do so ended up getting <a href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/06/thou_shall_not.html">booted out of  the movement</a>. &nbsp;</p>
<p>This sort of high-profile fight cannot be helping the Right  as it struggles to figure out how to maintain its influence going into the 2008  election.&nbsp; But at least it ought to make the upcoming Values Voter Summit  all the more interesting, since both Land and Dobson are <a href="http://www.frcaction.org/get.cfm?c=WASH_BRIEFING&amp;load=WX07C08">going  to be there</a>. &nbsp;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
