<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/first-amendment-protection-only-those-who-believe"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1413/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1413/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:37-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>First Amendment Protection Only For Those Who Believe</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/first-amendment-protection-only-those-who-believe" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/first-amendment-protection-only-those-who-believe</id>
    <published>2007-06-04T16:08:03-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:37-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Alliance Defense Fund" />
    <category term="Christian Legal Society" />
    <category term="First Amendment" />
    <category term="Liberty Counsel" />
    <category term="Maryland" />
    <category term="Mat Staver" />
    <category term="Rick Scarborough" />
    <category term="Virginia" />
    <category term="Vision America" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>After a lengthy legal battle, the   4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled <A title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001791.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001791.html">last   year</a> that the Montgomery County (MD) Public Schools&rsquo; &ldquo;policy for   distributing fliers by community groups [via a "backpack mail" program] is   unconstitutional because it gives school officials unlimited power to approve or   reject materials.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
<p>The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit   filed by Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, with the <A title="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/userdocs/updates/2006_0829.html" href="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/userdocs/updates/2006_0829.html">backing</a> of the Alliance Defense Fund and the Christian Legal Society, after its request   to distribute fliers regarding its <A title="http://www.cefonline.com/content/category/4/13/27/" href="http://www.cefonline.com/content/category/4/13/27/">Good News Club</a> -   which is designed to &ldquo;evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord   Jesus Christ and establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local   church for Christian living&rdquo; &ndash; was rejected.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Circuit Court sided with Child   Evangelism Fellowship, <A title="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/051508.P.pdf" href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/051508.P.pdf">ruling</a> [PDF]   that the school district&rsquo;s policy granted it &ldquo;unbridled discretion to deny   access to the oft-used forum &mdash; for any reason at all, including antipathy to a   particular viewpoint &mdash; [and] does not ensure the requisite viewpoint   neutrality.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Around the same time, the <A title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/groups/liberty_counsel/index.html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/groups/liberty_counsel/index.html">Liberty   Counsel</a>, which is <A title="http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_BasicArticle&amp;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1128767858506&amp;path=" href="http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_BasicArticle&amp;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1128767858506&amp;path=">directly   tied</a> to the late Jerry Falwell and his Liberty University, <A title="http://www.readthehook.com/stories/2006/09/28/NEWS%20fliers-B.doc.aspx" href="http://www.readthehook.com/stories/2006/09/28/NEWS%20fliers-B.doc.aspx">sent   a letter</a> to Albemarle County School Board in Virginia, warning it that its   refusal to distribute fliers about a church-sponsored vacation bible school via   its own "backpack mail" program was unconstitutional. </p>
<p>The school district quickly changed   its policy and the Liberty Counsel&rsquo;s Mat Staver was quite pleased: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're   pleased the school changed its policy so quickly and correctly," says Mat   Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman. "The law is clear-- when schools   allow the distribution of secular material, they must accommodate religious   material."</p>
<p>Staver   refers to a recent 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding a Good News   Club's right to distribute fliers in Montgomery County schools in Maryland. </p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>"They're not   required to accept everything," he says, citing exemptions for libelous, obscene   or pornographic material. Nor does he object if Muslim or Jewish groups want to   distribute information about their events in schools. "The First Amendment is   not just for the Liberty Counsel," he says. "You can't just pick and   choose."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But one year later, it seems as if   some on the Right are not so happy about Albemarle&rsquo;s new policy now that students are <A title="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55854" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55854">bringing home   fliers</a> for a summer camp for atheists and freethinkers. </p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>After a lengthy legal battle, the   4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled <A title="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001791.html" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001791.html">last   year</a> that the Montgomery County (MD) Public Schools&rsquo; &ldquo;policy for   distributing fliers by community groups [via a "backpack mail" program] is   unconstitutional because it gives school officials unlimited power to approve or   reject materials.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
<p>The ruling stemmed from a lawsuit   filed by Child Evangelism Fellowship of Maryland, with the <A title="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/userdocs/updates/2006_0829.html" href="http://www.alliancedefensefund.org/userdocs/updates/2006_0829.html">backing</a> of the Alliance Defense Fund and the Christian Legal Society, after its request   to distribute fliers regarding its <A title="http://www.cefonline.com/content/category/4/13/27/" href="http://www.cefonline.com/content/category/4/13/27/">Good News Club</a> -   which is designed to &ldquo;evangelize boys and girls with the Gospel of the Lord   Jesus Christ and establish (disciple) them in the Word of God and in a local   church for Christian living&rdquo; &ndash; was rejected.&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Circuit Court sided with Child   Evangelism Fellowship, <A title="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/051508.P.pdf" href="http://pacer.ca4.uscourts.gov/opinion.pdf/051508.P.pdf">ruling</a> [PDF]   that the school district&rsquo;s policy granted it &ldquo;unbridled discretion to deny   access to the oft-used forum &mdash; for any reason at all, including antipathy to a   particular viewpoint &mdash; [and] does not ensure the requisite viewpoint   neutrality.&rdquo;</p>
<p>Around the same time, the <A title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/groups/liberty_counsel/index.html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/groups/liberty_counsel/index.html">Liberty   Counsel</a>, which is <A title="http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_BasicArticle&amp;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1128767858506&amp;path=" href="http://www.newsadvance.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=LNA/MGArticle/LNA_BasicArticle&amp;c=MGArticle&amp;cid=1128767858506&amp;path=">directly   tied</a> to the late Jerry Falwell and his Liberty University, <A title="http://www.readthehook.com/stories/2006/09/28/NEWS%20fliers-B.doc.aspx" href="http://www.readthehook.com/stories/2006/09/28/NEWS%20fliers-B.doc.aspx">sent   a letter</a> to Albemarle County School Board in Virginia, warning it that its   refusal to distribute fliers about a church-sponsored vacation bible school via   its own "backpack mail" program was unconstitutional. </p>
<p>The school district quickly changed   its policy and the Liberty Counsel&rsquo;s Mat Staver was quite pleased: </p>
<blockquote>
<p>"We're   pleased the school changed its policy so quickly and correctly," says Mat   Staver, Liberty Counsel founder and chairman. "The law is clear-- when schools   allow the distribution of secular material, they must accommodate religious   material."</p>
<p>Staver   refers to a recent 4th Circuit Court of Appeals decision upholding a Good News   Club's right to distribute fliers in Montgomery County schools in Maryland. </p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>"They're not   required to accept everything," he says, citing exemptions for libelous, obscene   or pornographic material. Nor does he object if Muslim or Jewish groups want to   distribute information about their events in schools. "The First Amendment is   not just for the Liberty Counsel," he says. "You can't just pick and   choose."</p>
</blockquote>
<p>But one year later, it seems as if   some on the Right are not so happy about Albemarle&rsquo;s new policy now that students are <A title="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55854" href="http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=55854">bringing home   fliers</a> for a summer camp for atheists and freethinkers. </p>
<p>As Vision America&rsquo;s Rick Scarborough <A title="http://www.visionamerica.us/site/News2?abbr=RSR&amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;id=7573" href="http://www.visionamerica.us/site/News2?abbr=RSR&amp;page=NewsArticle&amp;id=7573">fumes</a>:   &nbsp;&nbsp;</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Teachers in   the Albemarle, Virginia School District   are rebelling at being required to distribute flyers for an atheist summer camp.   According to the left, while the First Amendment forbids an "establishment of   religion," an establishment of disbelief is apparently quite   acceptable.</p>
<p>The flyers   advertise Camp Quest, billed as "the first residential summer camp in the   history of the United States for the children of atheists, freethinkers,   humanists, 'brights,' or whatever other terms might be applied to those who hold   to a naturalistic, not a supernatural, lifestance."</p>
<p>&hellip;</p>
<p>[I]t&rsquo;s   outrageous to force teachers to distribute these   flyers</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Who thinks Scarborough would have responded similarly to a   non-Christian teacher who resisted sending home flyers proselytizing for an   evangelical Christian group?</p>
<p>For its part, the school board   claims that it is required to distribute the fliers because of the   4th Circuit&rsquo;s ruling regarding the Good News Club in Maryland, which Scarborough isn&rsquo;t buying: </p>
<blockquote><p>The district   claims an appellate court decision gives it no alternative. Nonsense! In ruling   on a ban on promotional material from the Christian Evangelism Fellowship, the   court held that school officials lack "unbridled discretion to deny access" to   material for non-school functions. The operative words here are "unbridled   discretion."</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course, Scarborough either misunderstands or is intentionally   misrepresenting the 4th Circuit&rsquo;s ruling. &nbsp;As noted above, the court <em>did not </em>rule that that school   officials lacked "&rsquo;unbridled discretion to deny access&rsquo; to material for   non-school functions,&rdquo; but rather that its policy <U>granted it</u> &ldquo;unbridled   discretion to deny access&rdquo; to its &ldquo;backpack mail&rdquo; program for any reason it saw   fit and thus was unconstitutional.&nbsp;</p>
<p>It appears as if the Albemarle   County School Board attempted to comply with the court&rsquo;s &ldquo;viewpoint neutral&rdquo;   requirement for such programs, just as it was reportedly instructed to do by The   Liberty Counsel. &nbsp;So if Scarborough is upset   that students are now bringing home fliers for an atheist summer camp, he ought   to take it up with Liberty Counsel, Child Evangelism Fellowship, the Alliance   Defense Fund, and the Christian Legal Society.</p>
<p>This isn&rsquo;t the first time that   Religious Right leaders have resisted others&rsquo; use of legal rights they demand   for themselves.&nbsp; The federal <A title="http://www.religioustolerance.org/equ_acce.htm" href="http://www.religioustolerance.org/equ_acce.htm">Equal Access Act</a> was   passed by Congress in 1984 at the urging of Religious Right groups that said   schools were violating the rights of students who wanted to form Bible clubs.&nbsp;   But when students who want to form gay-straight alliances have asserted the same   legal right (first affirmed by federal courts in <em><A title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=6681" href="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=6681"><SPAN title="http://www.pfaw.org/pfaw/general/default.aspx?oid=6681">Colin v. Orange   Unified School District</span></a></em>), Religious Right leaders and their political   allies frequently resist or try to erect barriers to those clubs. </p>
<p>- via AU&rsquo;s <A title="http://blog.au.org/2007/05/31/backpack-blowback-religious-right-activists-want-preferential-treatment-from-public-school-forum-they-created/" href="http://blog.au.org/2007/05/31/backpack-blowback-religious-right-activists-want-preferential-treatment-from-public-school-forum-they-created/">Wall   of Separation</a> </p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
