<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/more-namesake-anti-abortion-factions-clash"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1400/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1400/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:36-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>More Namesake Anti-Abortion Factions Clash</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/more-namesake-anti-abortion-factions-clash" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/more-namesake-anti-abortion-factions-clash</id>
    <published>2007-05-24T16:05:12-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:36-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Ezra</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Colorado" />
    <category term="Dave Schultheis" />
    <category term="Focus on the Family" />
    <category term="James Dobson" />
    <category term="National Right to Life Committee" />
    <category term="Operation Rescue" />
    <category term="Operation Save America" />
    <category term="Reproductive Health" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As we wrote yesterday, James   Dobson&rsquo;s applause for the Supreme Court&rsquo;s decision upholding the &ldquo;Partial Birth   Abortion Ban&rdquo; led to an <a title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/05/operation_whats.html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/05/operation_whats.html">unusual   row</a> between far-right anti-abortion groups: One group claiming the name   Operation Rescue condemned Dobson for backsliding and called on him to &ldquo;please   repent,&rdquo; while another group also calling itself Operation Rescue defended the   Focus on the Family leader. Oddly enough, a similar dispute emerged out of the   same anti-Dobson campaign.</p>
<p>Colorado Right to Life <a title="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_5967229" href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_5967229">joined</a> Flip Benham&rsquo;s   Operation Rescue/Operation Save America in taking out a full-page ad in the   Gazette, the newspaper in Colorado   Springs, where Focus on the Family is located. Focus&rsquo;s   Citizenlink web site <a title="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004696.cfm" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004696.cfm">responded</a> with an   article that enlists the support of Colorado Right to Life&rsquo;s parent group,   National Right to Life:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The National Right to Life Committee   said it&rsquo;s &ldquo;in complete disagreement&rdquo; with an ad sponsored by a state affiliate   that attacks Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family   Action. &hellip;</p>
<p>David O&rsquo;Steen, executive director of   National Right to Life in Washington, D.C., said the Colorado affiliate is wrong about the court   ruling. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s the first time that the court has allowed the legislative branch   to outlaw a specific abortion procedure,&rdquo; O&rsquo;Steen told CitizenLink. &ldquo;We think   it&rsquo;s a great victory.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The Colorado affiliate is also wrong about Dobson,   he explained. &ldquo;We appreciate Dr. Dobson, and we appreciate his support to end   partial birth abortion,&rdquo; O&rsquo;Steen said. &ldquo;We agree with him that the decision is a   breakthrough.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As the New York Times reported,   National Right to Life sees the Supreme Court&rsquo;s decision as a <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/washington/22abortion.html" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/washington/22abortion.html">vindication</a> of its strategy emphasizing that abortion restrictions are important because   women don&rsquo;t know better &ndash; <a title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070521&amp;s=stansell052107" href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070521&amp;s=stansell052107">an idea   seemingly echoed</a> by the court&rsquo;s majority   opinion.</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>As we wrote yesterday, James   Dobson&rsquo;s applause for the Supreme Court&rsquo;s decision upholding the &ldquo;Partial Birth   Abortion Ban&rdquo; led to an <a title="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/05/operation_whats.html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/05/operation_whats.html">unusual   row</a> between far-right anti-abortion groups: One group claiming the name   Operation Rescue condemned Dobson for backsliding and called on him to &ldquo;please   repent,&rdquo; while another group also calling itself Operation Rescue defended the   Focus on the Family leader. Oddly enough, a similar dispute emerged out of the   same anti-Dobson campaign.</p>
<p>Colorado Right to Life <a title="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_5967229" href="http://www.denverpost.com/news/ci_5967229">joined</a> Flip Benham&rsquo;s   Operation Rescue/Operation Save America in taking out a full-page ad in the   Gazette, the newspaper in Colorado   Springs, where Focus on the Family is located. Focus&rsquo;s   Citizenlink web site <a title="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004696.cfm" href="http://www.citizenlink.org/CLNews/A000004696.cfm">responded</a> with an   article that enlists the support of Colorado Right to Life&rsquo;s parent group,   National Right to Life:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The National Right to Life Committee   said it&rsquo;s &ldquo;in complete disagreement&rdquo; with an ad sponsored by a state affiliate   that attacks Dr. James Dobson, founder and chairman of Focus on the Family   Action. &hellip;</p>
<p>David O&rsquo;Steen, executive director of   National Right to Life in Washington, D.C., said the Colorado affiliate is wrong about the court   ruling. &ldquo;It&rsquo;s the first time that the court has allowed the legislative branch   to outlaw a specific abortion procedure,&rdquo; O&rsquo;Steen told CitizenLink. &ldquo;We think   it&rsquo;s a great victory.&rdquo;</p>
<p>The Colorado affiliate is also wrong about Dobson,   he explained. &ldquo;We appreciate Dr. Dobson, and we appreciate his support to end   partial birth abortion,&rdquo; O&rsquo;Steen said. &ldquo;We agree with him that the decision is a   breakthrough.&rdquo;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As the New York Times reported,   National Right to Life sees the Supreme Court&rsquo;s decision as a <a title="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/washington/22abortion.html" href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/22/washington/22abortion.html">vindication</a> of its strategy emphasizing that abortion restrictions are important because   women don&rsquo;t know better &ndash; <a title="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070521&amp;s=stansell052107" href="http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=20070521&amp;s=stansell052107">an idea   seemingly echoed</a> by the court&rsquo;s majority   opinion.</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
