<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Right Wing Watch</title>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/when-all-else-fails-blame-media"/>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1206/atom/feed"/>
  <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/node/1206/atom/feed</id>
  <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:24-05:00</updated>
  <entry>
    <title>When All Else Fails, Blame the Media</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/when-all-else-fails-blame-media" />
    <id>http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/when-all-else-fails-blame-media</id>
    <published>2007-03-30T16:06:54-05:00</published>
    <updated>2008-08-07T15:58:24-05:00</updated>
    <author>
      <name>Kyle</name>
    </author>
    <category term="Focus on the Family" />
    <category term="James Dobson" />
    <category term="Media" />
    <category term="Politics" />
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It looks as if James Dobson is   trying to back away from his <A href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/03/dobson_seeks_to.html">attack</a> on   possible GOP presidential nominee Fred Thompson.&nbsp; </p>
<p>In an interview with <em>US News and World Report&rsquo;s</em> Dan   Gilgoff, Dobson recently <A href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070328/28dobson_print.htm">attempted</a> to throw cold water on Thompson's candidacy because, in Dobson words, he doesn't   "think [Thompson is] a Christian." &nbsp;Since then, the people at Focus on the   Family have apparently realized that it is just this sort of thing that lends   credence to Dick Armey&rsquo;s <A href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/09/being_a_christian_is_no_excuse_for_being_stupid.html">accusation</a> that &ldquo;Dobson and his gang of thugs are real nasty bullies&rdquo; and thus have decided   to fight back the only way they know how: <A title="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/70932651.html" href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/70932651.html">by blaming the   media</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In   conclusion, we would caution friends of our ministry not to believe what they   read about Dr. Dobson in the secular media today. Never in the 30-year history   of this ministry has there been more reporting and outright distortion of his   beliefs and teachings. It is apparent that those who represent a liberal   worldview seek to marginalize him and confuse our friends. Anyone who ever has a   question concerning what they read about Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family is   encouraged to contact us for clarification. The chances are they have been   misinformed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gilgoff did not   solicit Dobson&rsquo;s view on this issue -- Dobson sought him out in order to   undermine Thompson and praise Newt Gingrich. But now he isn&rsquo;t happy with the   results.</p>
<p>It should be noted that this is not the first   time Dobson has been angry with the coverage he received in <em>US News and World Report</em>. &nbsp;As Gilgoff   explained in the <A href="http://www.thejesusmachine.com/exerptintro.php">introduction</a> to his   book - &ldquo;The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and   Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War&rdquo; &ndash; he first interviewed Dobson   following the 2004 election for an   article about the influence of so-called &ldquo;values voters.&rdquo; A few   weeks later, when Gilgoff was working on a follow-up piece, he tried to contact   Dobson again only to be denied an interview request because Dobson was upset   that he had only received one quote in Gilgoff&rsquo;s previous article.   &nbsp;</p>
<p>But Gilgoff went to Focus on the   Family headquarters anyway and eventually scored a second interview with Dobson: </p>
<blockquote><p>At the end   of my second day in Colorado   Springs, however, Dobson&rsquo;s aide told me that he might   grant an interview the following morning, my last at Focus headquarters.   Representatives from Focus&rsquo;s media relations department had been sitting in on   all of my interviews with Focus staff, and thought my questions were well   informed, and, more important, unbiased. I had passed a crucial   test.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gilgoff   then went on to write an entire book   about Dobson and his empire -&nbsp; a book which must not have displeased Dobson too   greatly, considering that he hand-picked Gilgoff as his outlet for getting the   word out about Thompson. &nbsp;Yet once Gilgoff reported that Dobson had questioned   the faith of a potential Republican presidential candidate while praising a   thrice-married adulterer, FOF responded by alleging a grand conspiracy by which   the &ldquo;secular media&rdquo; seeks to &ldquo;marginalize [Dobson] and confuse our friends.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Despite Dobson&rsquo;s   accusations, <em>US News</em> is <A href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/blogs/news_blog/070330/dobson_disputes_us_news_story.htm">standing by</a> its initial report,   saying the &ldquo;piece was accurate and representative of the spirit of Dobson's   comments.&rdquo;</p>
    ]]></summary>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p>It looks as if James Dobson is   trying to back away from his <A href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2007/03/dobson_seeks_to.html">attack</a> on   possible GOP presidential nominee Fred Thompson.&nbsp; </p>
<p>In an interview with <em>US News and World Report&rsquo;s</em> Dan   Gilgoff, Dobson recently <A href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070328/28dobson_print.htm">attempted</a> to throw cold water on Thompson's candidacy because, in Dobson words, he doesn't   "think [Thompson is] a Christian." &nbsp;Since then, the people at Focus on the   Family have apparently realized that it is just this sort of thing that lends   credence to Dick Armey&rsquo;s <A href="http://www.rightwingwatch.org/2006/09/being_a_christian_is_no_excuse_for_being_stupid.html">accusation</a> that &ldquo;Dobson and his gang of thugs are real nasty bullies&rdquo; and thus have decided   to fight back the only way they know how: <A title="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/70932651.html" href="http://www.christiannewswire.com/news/70932651.html">by blaming the   media</a></p>
<blockquote><p>In   conclusion, we would caution friends of our ministry not to believe what they   read about Dr. Dobson in the secular media today. Never in the 30-year history   of this ministry has there been more reporting and outright distortion of his   beliefs and teachings. It is apparent that those who represent a liberal   worldview seek to marginalize him and confuse our friends. Anyone who ever has a   question concerning what they read about Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family is   encouraged to contact us for clarification. The chances are they have been   misinformed.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gilgoff did not   solicit Dobson&rsquo;s view on this issue -- Dobson sought him out in order to   undermine Thompson and praise Newt Gingrich. But now he isn&rsquo;t happy with the   results.</p>
<p>It should be noted that this is not the first   time Dobson has been angry with the coverage he received in <em>US News and World Report</em>. &nbsp;As Gilgoff   explained in the <A href="http://www.thejesusmachine.com/exerptintro.php">introduction</a> to his   book - &ldquo;The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and   Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War&rdquo; &ndash; he first interviewed Dobson   following the 2004 election for an   article about the influence of so-called &ldquo;values voters.&rdquo; A few   weeks later, when Gilgoff was working on a follow-up piece, he tried to contact   Dobson again only to be denied an interview request because Dobson was upset   that he had only received one quote in Gilgoff&rsquo;s previous article.   &nbsp;</p>
<p>But Gilgoff went to Focus on the   Family headquarters anyway and eventually scored a second interview with Dobson: </p>
<blockquote><p>At the end   of my second day in Colorado   Springs, however, Dobson&rsquo;s aide told me that he might   grant an interview the following morning, my last at Focus headquarters.   Representatives from Focus&rsquo;s media relations department had been sitting in on   all of my interviews with Focus staff, and thought my questions were well   informed, and, more important, unbiased. I had passed a crucial   test.</p></blockquote>
<p>Gilgoff   then went on to write an entire book   about Dobson and his empire -&nbsp; a book which must not have displeased Dobson too   greatly, considering that he hand-picked Gilgoff as his outlet for getting the   word out about Thompson. &nbsp;Yet once Gilgoff reported that Dobson had questioned   the faith of a potential Republican presidential candidate while praising a   thrice-married adulterer, FOF responded by alleging a grand conspiracy by which   the &ldquo;secular media&rdquo; seeks to &ldquo;marginalize [Dobson] and confuse our friends.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
<p>Despite Dobson&rsquo;s   accusations, <em>US News</em> is <A href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/blogs/news_blog/070330/dobson_disputes_us_news_story.htm">standing by</a> its initial report,   saying the &ldquo;piece was accurate and representative of the spirit of Dobson's   comments.&rdquo;</p>
    ]]></content>
  </entry>
</feed>
