With hate crimes legislation scheduled to be voted on in the Senate next week, the Religious Right seems somewhat resigned to the fact that they do not have to votes to stop it or even slow it down, but that doesn’t mean that they aren’t trying.
Yesterday was apparently “National ‘Stop S. 909’ Day” during which “the American Family Association, Family Research Council, Focus on the Family, and other conservative activist groups [urged] their supporters to call, e-mail, fax, or visit their senators today to express their disapproval of S. 909, the Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act (Senate Bill 909).”
James Dobson and Tony Perkins discussed it on Dobson’s radio program yesterday, with Dobson proclaiming that its passage would be used to silence pastors and Focus on the Family is calling on its activists to contact their senators and “”ask them to oppose S.909 or ‘hate-crimes’ legislation in any form.”
Of course, as we’ve pointed out before, the Religious Right doesn’t really oppose “hate crimes legislation in any form,” they just oppose protection for gays.
But since it looks like they’ll be unable to stop the legislation’s passage, they appear to be turning their attention toward stopping efforts to amend the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act to include bullying and harassment prevention program because it also provides protection based on sexual orientation … and so they are trotting out the exact same bogus claims they used in opposing hate crimes legislation:
The U.S. House of Representatives is considering a so-called bullying bill that would require public schools to spell out special categories in their discipline policies, including “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”
Family advocates say it will pave the way for a pro-homosexual, adult-driven agenda in public schools.
The name of the bill is Safe Schools Improvement Act.
Focus on the Family’s Education Analyst Candi Cushman explained that there is a way to deal with the issue in a fair and objective way, without sexualizing and politicizing the school environment.
“We recognize that bullying and the harm it causes in the lives of kids is tragic and shouldn’t be allowed to happen,” Cushman said. “We agree schools should be encouraged to have strong policies prohibiting bullying—applied equally and across the board, against any child for any reason.”
She said parents need to keep a close watch on the progress of the bill, because if it passes, it could be used to undermine parental rights and local control.
“People need to realize that gay activists will use this federal mandate as the leverage they need to get promotion of homosexuality into public schools,” Cushman cautioned.
Jeremiah Dys, president of The Family Policy Council of West Virginia, said the bill’s language is taking the focus off of the real problem.
“A bully is a bully because he’s a bully, not because of who he bullies,” Dys said. “The rules ought to be enforced against the bullies regardless of who they’re bullying or what actions he takes.”
The Traditional Values Coalition has also come out against it by tying it into the Religious Right’s crusade against Kevin Jennings, claiming it turn the nation’s public schools into bastions of homosexuality:
If this legislation is passed, it will permit Jennings to spend millions of our tax dollars to push the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender agenda in schools under the guise of fighting “bullying” and allegedly promoting “school safety.”
…
Jennings will use millions of our tax dollars to push the promotion of lesbian, bisexual, gay, and transgender behaviors upon hundreds of thousands of school districts throughout our nation.
Make no mistake: The Safe Schools Improvement Act is an ATM machine for the LGBT agenda. Issues about school safety and bullying are simply smokescreens to hide the real agenda.
Note the definitions of bullying and harassment. Under this bill, any gay or cross-dressing teen who is “bullied” or “harassed,” can claim protection. It includes a teen’s “actual or perceived” sexual orientation or gender identity (code for cross-dressers or transsexuals).
If a straight teen criticizes the sexual behavior of a gay or cross-dressing teen, he is guilty of bullying or harassment. This is a direct attack upon free speech.
Let’s take a look at the definitions of bullying and harrassment, as TVC suggests, shall we:
(12) BULLYING- The term `bullying’ means conduct that–
`(A) adversely affects the ability of one or more students to participate in or benefit from the school’s educational programs or activities by placing the student (or students) in reasonable fear of physical harm; and
`(B) includes conduct that is based on–
`(i) a student’s actual or perceived–
`(I) race;
`(II) color;
`(III) national origin;
`(IV) sex;
`(V) disability;
`(VI) sexual orientation;
`(VII) gender identity; or
`(VIII) religion;
`(ii) any other distinguishing characteristics that may be defined by a State or local educational agency; or
`(iii) association with a person or group with one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics listed in clause (i) or (ii).
`(13) HARASSMENT- The term `harassment’ means conduct that–
`(A) adversely affects the ability of one or more students to participate in or benefit from the school’s educational programs or activities because the conduct, as reasonably perceived by the student (or students), is so severe, persistent, or pervasive; and
`(B) includes conduct that is based on–
`(i) a student’s actual or perceived–
`(I) race;
`(II) color;
`(III) national origin;
`(IV) sex;
`(V) disability;
`(VI) sexual orientation;
`(VII) gender identity; or
`(VIII) religion;
`(ii) any other distinguishing characteristics that may be defined by a State or local educational agency; or
`(iii) association with a person or group with one or more of the actual or perceived characteristics listed in clause (i) or (ii).
Bullying entails “reasonable fear of physical harm” and harassment must be “severe, persistent, or pervasive” but, just as they did with hate crimes, the Right is completely misrepresenting this legislation.
And notice also that they are not complaining about the protections included for religion or race – they are simply opposed to protections for gays.
It’s becoming pretty clear that even after the hate crimes legislation is passed by Congress and signed into law, we can look forward to having the same exact fight over anti-bullying legislation, complete with the same exact right-wing scare-tactics and false claims.
