What Passes For News At CBN

CBN's David Brody asks "why is everybody so angry at government these days?" And by "everybody," he apparently means "right wing tea party activists" and Republican leaders like Rep. Michele Bachmann and Newt Gingrich, which is why he produced this segment in which he likens the current right-wing opposition to President Obama and the Democratic Congress to the American Revolution, with Gingrich explaining that Americans are once again outraged at their "aloof" and "dictatorial" government:

PFAW

Brody: Right-Wing Campaign Against Obama's Czars "Misleading"

Others have already pointed out that the whole Glenn Beck/Fox News/right-wing crusade against President Obama's "czars" is totally bogus.  Now, even CBN's David Brody is weighing in to set the record straight, calling the whole right-wing campaign misleading:

The Brody File has been researching this topic for an upcoming story to air on The 700 Club and here's a simple fact: The Czar list compiled by Fox News and other outlets is just not fully accurate. They are listing people like Cass Sunstein, John Holdren and a few others as Czars but these folks have been confirmed by the Senate. That is significant because the main contention here is that these Czars run around unchecked and unaccountable to Congress. Their list shouldn't include them. If you want to make the argument that Sunstein and Holdren shouldn't be nominated by President Obama because of things they've either said or done in the past then fine but to add them to the Czar total is really misleading.

Look, you can make the argument that the Obama administration has increased the number of so called Czars and it has even concerned liberals like Senator Russ Feingold and Senator Robert Byrd. Still, if you want to bring credibility to your argument you need to get your facts straight. Conservative media outlets hurt themselves when the information they provide isn't the total picture. It may play well with Obama's staunch critics but doesn't the full truth matter? Conservative media complain about the mainstream media ignoring them (and they have a point) but if Czar lists are inaccurate then is it no wonder that the MSM may question the factual credibility of future stories?

PFAW
Filed under:

Right Wing Leftovers

  • The response to Gov. Bobby Jindal's address last night was almost universally negative ... with the exception of CBN's David Brody who said "Jindal's star is shining bright."
  • Speaking of Jindal, Rush Limbaugh warns any conservative who dares to criticize him that he doesn't ever want to hear from them again.
  • The Weekly Standard Gary Andres links to this Gallup poll on presidential approval ratings in a post titled "At One-Month Mark, Obama's Approval Rating Lower than Jimmy Carter's."  Of course, that might have something to do with the fact that Carter had the highest approval rating one-month into his term of any president in the last forty years, so every president has had a lower approval rating than Carter.
  • Finally, the Liberty Counsel warns that Democrats are using the economic crisis to "undermine the rights of people of faith":
  • If America is truly in the worst financial crisis in 70 years, why are President Obama and Congress unleashing new attacks almost daily on our faith and families? ... The so-called "stimulus" bill proved this point. Ultraliberal politicians are using people's fears as a cover for a massive political makeover of our Nation! Their strategy is to profit off the misery of others in order to move forward a very liberal agenda. Such a strategy is just as deplorable for elected officials as the actions of profiteers who gouged people at the gas pumps following the hurricane Katrina disaster!

PFAW

The Zombie Lie Lumbers On

As part of our on-going crusade to debunk the right-wing lie started a few days ago by the ACLJ about a supposedly "anti-Christian" provision in the stimulus bill, we've been keeping track of where this talking point has been popping up and continuously pointing out that it is entirely bogus.

But that hasn't stopped the Right from spreading it and now the amendment that Sen. Jim DeMint offered to strip this "controversial" provision from the legislation is reportedly scheduled for a vote in the Senate today.

Interestingly, earlier today the Christian Anti-Defamation Commission also jumped on board this "Christian victimization" bandwagon and added their voice to those who were demanding that the provision be removed from the legislation ... but now the piece has disappeared from its website. Perhaps Gary Cass and company realized that they were dead wrong about this and removed it to save themselves the embarrassment. (Update: It looks like the CADC is back on board, as this article has been re-posted on its website.)

Unfortunately, the same cannot be said for The Brody File.  CBN's David Brody was the first to report that Sen. DeMint was opposing this provision, saying it was "an attack on people of faith and I don't think Americans will stand for it." 

Following Brody's post yesterday, I wrote this post where I again pointed out that this was in no way true and sent it, along with our initial post debunking this falsehood, to Brody directly, pointing out that the ACLJ’s claims, as well as those made by Sen. DeMint, were blatantly misleading and outright false.  Being that Brody considers himself a journalist and regularly gets asked to appear on CNN both as a host and a commentator, I figured he'd want to correct the record so as not to misinform his audience.

But apparently that was not the case, as Brody hasn't seen fit to bother correcting this misinformation.  In fact, not only has it not been corrected, but now we find his producer, Laura Kraus, writing posts on his blog where she perpetuates the same false statements:

Basically, this broad language could mean that any school or university building that might host an occasional prayer breakfast or religious student association would not be able to receive this federal aid, even if the primary purpose of the meeting room is a classroom or gym. Since the Supreme Court has previously ruled in 2001 that it's unconstitutional to restrict religious speech and expression in public facilities like schools.

No it wouldn't ... and if you bothered to do any research at all, you would know that.

And then, for good measure, Robertson offers up this trenchant bit of analysis:

The amendment is expected to pass when voted on today, but we'll see. If DeMint's amendment is not added to the current stimulus package, the division caused by section 803 could cause a huge headache for the Obama Administration.

If this amendment passes, it'll be an absolute disgrace ... but if it doesn't, the primary "headache" the Obama Administration will have in dealing with this will come from being forced to continually shoot down the incessant lies that Religious Right groups and their allies in the media keep spreading about it.

PFAW

Understanding The Meaning of "Exclusive"

Unlike David Brody, I am not a journalist and don't regularly get asked to host programs and provide insight on CNN ... so maybe there is some journalistic definition of the word "exclusive" with which I am unfamiliar:

EXCLUSIVE: Video of Pastors Physically Blessing Obama's Inaugural Walkway
January 9, 2009

You have to check out this video. It was sent exclusively to The Brody File.

The video in question is of Congressman Paul Broun, Rob Schenck of Faith and Action and Patrick Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition anointing the doorway President-Elect Barack Obama will pass through on his way to being sworn in next week ... which we posted last week:

Considering that Schenck and company sent out a press release about it on January 7th and then posted the video the same day on Schenck's Faith and Action YouTube page, at which point we and others wrote about it, it's hard to understand how this is in any way a Brody File "exclusive." 

PFAW

CNN Hands Over the Reins to Robertson’s Brody

Buried on the National Journal’s Hotline blog is this intriguing little nugget:

Election Countdown: View from the Right features Townhall.com's Amanda Carpenter, Washington Times' Brian DeBose, Weekly Standard's Stephen Hayes and ex-Romney press sec. Kevin Madden (CNN, SAT, 5pm).

It seems that CNN has decided that the weekend before the election is as good a time as any to give conservative commentators an hour of free airtime to lay out their agenda.  If CNN is also planning on giving liberals an hour to talk about the election, I haven’t heard anything about it.  

To make it even better, it’s being hosted by David Brody of Pat Robertson’s Christian Broadcasting Network:

The Brody File will be hosting a one hour political roundtable show this weekend on CNN.

It will be an Election special devoted to how conservatives view this 2008 election and the future of the GOP.

I'll be hosting the show and the roundtable will include Kevin Madden, Stephen Hayes, Amanda Carpenter and Brian Debose.

It will air this Saturday from 5pm-6pm and again on Sunday at 2pm.

I’ve criticized Brody several times before, especially for his incessant coverage of the Jeremiah Wright issue, and wondered why CNN keeps giving him airtime, which Brody brags is a great opportunity to expose people to Pat Robertson’s worldview.

But apparently CNN has decided that what the country needs to hear before they go to the polls next week are the views of a bunch of conservatives moderated by Pat Robertson’s in-house journalist.

PFAW

Palin Says She and God are Being Mocked

Sarah Palin sat down the CBN’s David Brody over the weekend and Brody has now posted various excerpts on his blog.

Among other things, Palin tried to explain her infamous “I read all of them” response to Katie Couric’s question regarding which newspapers she reads by saying she was irritated that Couric wasn’t asking her about real issues and that it’s the sort of thing that only “the Washington elite and the media” care about.

She also defended the recent tone at various McCain and Palin events, saying that if she ever heard people in the audience say anything inappropriate, she “would call 'em out on that,” and likewise defended her efforts to link Barack Obama to William Ayers, saying “I would say it again.”

She then explained to Brody why she wasn’t doing press conferences or appearing on news programs to be interviewed – and it’s because they will just mock her:

Brody: Let me ask you a little bit about media scrutiny because some of the media networks...wonder why you don't go on some of the 24/7 cable networks. What is your response to that?

Palin: Well sometimes it just doesn't do any good. I mean you set yourself up just to continually be mocked, you know so sometimes that doesn't do any good, but what I have done in this campaign is in reaching out to the American voters through our rallies, through the one on ones, through the small meetings that we've had trying to get our message out, our plans for this country out there minus the filter of some of the filter of the mainstream media because, because that filter as, as we see every day when we turn on the news too often there is this, this opaqueness, there is this, this spin, this contortion of a person's words and intentions and that does more harm than good, so it's a greater challenge for me and for John McCain to try to get our message out there without that filter of I think some of the world's media.

And speaking of being mocked, it’s not just Palin that is being ridiculed, it’s also God:

Brody: There have been some shots taken at you…regarding your Christian faith…The Pentecostal stuff, the gifts of the Holy Spirit. Do you want to clear up exactly what you believe in and so that the record can be set straight a little bit? Because there have been some editorials and others taking shots at you regarding --

Palin: Yeah, and I think the saddest part of that is that faith, not just my faith, faith and God in general has been mocked through this campaign, and that breaks my heart and that is unfair for others who share a faith in God and chose to worship our Lord in whatever private manner that they deem fit and my faith has always been pretty personal. I haven't really worn it on my sleeve. I haven't been out there preaching it. I've always been of the mind that you walk the walk. You just don't have to be talking the talk about your beliefs, so just wanting maybe my life to be able to reflect my faith. So it's always been pretty personal and that was kind of a surprise in the last couple of months that people would misconstrue and spin anything that has to do with my faith or anybody else's and turn it into something to be mocked.

Hmmmm … tell that to Barack Obama.

Finally, Palin weighed in on the need for a Federal Marriage Amendment and couched it, as she always does, in her own assertion that she not bigoted or judgmental:

Brody: On Constitutional marriage amendment, are, are you for something like that?

Palin: I am, in my own, state, I have voted along with the vast majority of Alaskans who had the opportunity to vote to amend our Constitution defining marriage as between one man and one woman. I wish on a federal level that that's where we would go because I don't support gay marriage. I'm not going to be out there judging individuals, sitting in a seat of judgment telling what they can and can't do, should and should not do, but I certainly can express my own opinion here and take actions that I believe would be best for traditional marriage and that's casting my votes and speaking up for traditional marriage that, that instrument that it's the foundation of our society is that strong family and that's based on that traditional definition of marriage, so I do support that.

So she’s not for telling anyone “what they can and can't do” … unless they are gay, in which case Palin is all for telling them they can’t get married.

PFAW

The "700 Club" Scores Palin Interview

Sarah Palin continues her whirlwind media trip, following up hard-hitting interviews with "journalists" like Sean Hannity, Hugh Hewitt, and Rush Limbaugh with an exclusive sit-down with the Christian Broadcasting Network's David Brody: 

The Brody File is scheduled to sit down one-on-one with Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin this weekend in Lancaster, Pa. Expect to see clips from the interview first thing Monday morning on The Brody File ... it'll be a great chance for Brody File readers and 700 Club viewers to get a possibly different perspective of her rather than the storyline in the mainstream media.

We've noticed before that John McCain has been openly refusing invitations to sit with Brody, but it looks like Palin is not quite as worried about showing up to talk with a man who works directly for an "agent of intolerance."  

It seems that all of Brody's praying has finally paid off and, as a former journalist herself, maybe Brody can get her thoughts on his belief that journalism is a great way to spread the Gospel and win converts for Christ.

PFAW

Journalism’s Higher Calling

Recently, CBN’s David Brody delivered the keynote address as the Baptist Press Collegiate Journalism Conference where he explained to his audience that journalism is a great way to spread the Gospel and win converts for Christ:

“If we can go ahead and say intelligent things on the air in a mainstream media network, then maybe they’ll listen to our Jesus talk as well,” Brody said. “And you never know how that’s subconsciously going through, but I can tell you that you definitely get witnessing opportunities to shine your light in the mainstream media world.”

“The blog that I write is viewed by the mainstream networks, and it’s an opportunity at that point to really talk to people about what it means to be saved and grace and redemption of Jesus Christ,” he said. “I do that quite a bit on my blog. You don’t hammer them over the head with it, but at the same time you don’t want to miss opportunities either.”

Brody declared that he prays before his on-air appearances because “no journalism can be successful without divine enabling” and that that it was because of prayer that he has managed to secure interviews with newsmakers like Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (though he has still been unable to win over John McCain):

In addition to articulating a Christian worldview in their work, Christian journalists also must rely on God to sustain them and guide them, Brody said. He told how God has worked through prayer many times to land interviews and work out challenging details.

During the 2008 primary season, Brody worked for an entire year to get an interview with Hillary Clinton. The night before the scheduled interview, it was still uncertain whether Clinton would come, he said. But his producer spent an hour and a half in prayer, and Clinton showed up at the appointed time.

According to the article, Brody believes that “Christian journalists have an opportunity to change the world” and so it only makes sense that he plies his trade on behalf of Pat Robertson.  As for what CNN thinks he brings to the table, that remains to be answered.

PFAW

Right Wing Women Rechristened “Bible Study Moms”

Just last week we were dismissively commenting on the supposed emergence of a new electoral demographic – the “faith moms” – noting that they seemed to be little more than the creation of Patrick Mahoney of the Christian Defense Coalition who coined the term based on observations about his own family.  

But what do you know?  CBN’s David Brody is reporting that there just might be something to this after all:  

The Brody File has been told that there are plans underway to organize a “Faith Moms” rally for Sarah Palin when she takes on Senator Biden at the October 2nd debate in St. Louis. The McCain camp is not behind it. It’s being organized by a couple of unnamed (for now) Evangelical groups.

We’ve heard a lot of talk about “hockey moms” ever since Sarah Palin entered the race. And yes, Palin is attracting these strong, Independent fierce, “pit bulls with lipstick” for sure. But the enthusiasm and the “get out of your seats and do something” spirit looks to be coming from what we may want to call “Bible Study Moms”.

And who does Brody quote to fill us in on this emerging new group – you guessed it:

Evangelical leader, Reverend Patrick Mahoney, tells me the following:

“It's fascinating what is going between Palin and these "Faith Moms."  It is not something that is being hyped by the media or being manufactured by the campaigns.  There is a true, honest, sincere bonding that is going on that is quite extraordinary.  Politics these days is so orchestrated it comes as a breath of fresh air when something completely unexpected breaks on the scene.  They sense that she is one of them and for the first time understands their struggles and hopes.”

Just out of curiosity, what exactly is a “Bible study mom”?  

These moms are the millions across this country who are ecstatic that McCain picked a strong Christian woman as his running mate. These are the moms who go to their Bible studies in the middle of the week and send in checks to places like Concerned Women for America and other Christian organizations.

Interesting. Just last week women fitting this description were better known as “right wing activists,” but apparently they are now part of an exciting and important new electoral subset. Who knew?

PFAW
Syndicate content