C4

Austin Ruse: The 'Radical Homosexuals' Are 'Coming For Your Daughters!'

In our inbox today is yet another hysterical fundraising pitch from C-Fam’s Austin Ruse, under the subject line “They’re Coming for your Daughters! Meet Your Daughters’ Champion!”

Emphases are Ruse’s:

Without a doubt they are coming for your daughter and your son and your grandchildren. They don’t have any children of their own. They are deliberately barren. So, they have set their sights on yours, your innocent girls and boys.

From among our children they want to build an army that will subvert our world and create even more victims. They must subvert the family and the Church because the family and the Church are our sole protectors. The state cannot be counted on to help us. We are alone.

Who is coming for our children?

  • UN Radicals
  • UN Agencies
  • International Planned Parenthood
  • Human Rights Campaign
  • Radical homosexuals

They use international institutions to impose their view on countries but most especially on children. They want to spread their devilish gospel of UN-style contraception, population control, p*rnography, abortion, gay rights, and all the other aspects of the sexual revolution that have caused untold sorrow in the United States and around the world.

THE BODY COUNT GROWS EVER HIGHER

They have billions of dollars and the awful might of governments behind them. And the body count grows ever higher. How many dead babies? A hundred million? More? How many dead from sexually transmitted diseases? Hundreds of millions. How many infected? How many divorces? How many addicted to violent p*rn?

There is really nothing to stop them . . . except C-Fam and a handful of others.

Ruse goes on to profile C-Fam staffer Susan Yoshihara, “who stands on the wall defending your children from the wicked ideologists that seek to take them from you, that seek to turn them against you, that seek the damnation of their souls.”

D'Souza: Obama's Foreign Policy An 'Un-American Project'

On Frank Gaffney’s “Secure Freedom Radio” program yesterday, right-wing filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza suggested that President Obama “is not looking out for America” because he’s taken on the “un-American project” of being “a world referee” instead.

“Look, you know most Americans, most presidents, Republican or Democrat, are within America, and they look at America and the world from inside America,” D’Souza said. “Obama, oddly enough, although born in America, sees himself as kind of a world figure. He’s outside America. America is this sort of petulant child making demands on him and he imperiously gets to decide, ‘Well, that’s reasonable, well, that’s not reasonable, I’m not going to go along with that.’”

D’Souza continued, “So Obama, in a sense, is not looking out for America. You never get the feeling that he is aggressively protecting America’s interests. You get the feeling that he’s some sort of a world referee, if you will, applying a kind of moral lens to decide if America deserves these claims being impetuously pressed forward. So that is a very, to me, un-American project that Obama represents, and whether Hillary will continue that, I’m not really sure, but what I am sure is this has actually been the legacy of the past eight years.”

William Gheen: Obama Administration-Backed Socialists Will Rig The Election

On conservative radio host Rocky D’s show yesterday, William Gheen of the anti-immigrant Americans for Legal Immigration PAC claimed that polls, the media and the 2016 election are rigged by Democrats and warned listeners that the Black Panthers and “leftist socialists backed by the Obama administration” will soon commit “civil rights abuses” against “older conservative America” to influence the election.

Gheen claimed that Donald Trump is currently leading despite “bogus polls coming from CNN and AOL and all these leftist groups that want everyone to believe that Hillary is being competitive; she’s not.”

“They’re going to try to psych people out with a bunch of disinformation to manufacture consent, as Chomsky would call it, against Trump,” Gheen said.

Gheen claimed that “the polls are rigged, CNN is rigged, Fox News is rigged. You’re only getting bits of the truth through talk radio and the internet, but beyond that, there’s a bigger rigging that we’re going to start broadcasting. Right now, we’re focused on [defeating] Paul Ryan and John McCain, but right after that, we need to start warning everybody the truth of the matter is the heavily criminal Democratic precincts, okay, if you look at crime rates anywhere in the country and you focus in on high crime areas, you’re looking at a Democrat stronghold, okay. You wanna go grab the police reports of who got arrested last night, compare them against the voter files, you’re going to look at a vast majority of Democrats.”

Gheen said that “a lot of criminality and voter fraud” occur in these Democratic “criminal precincts” where undocumented immigrants also reside and vote “in large numbers.”

“Even if by election day, Trump is up 65, 70 percent over Hillary’s 30-something, he could still lose because they’re going to vote the graveyards and the illegal aliens and the nursing homes, and this is gonna be the biggest, dirtiest Chicago-style Democratic robbery election that America has ever seen,” Gheen said.

Gheen continued to blame liberals for Republicans’ election losses.

“What you’re seeing right now with the Black Lives Matter movement and the illegal immigrants getting all stirred up and, you know, all the social — it’s not just protest anymore,” Gheen said. “This is a socialist uprising that is being fomented as we head towards Election Day, and mark my words, before and by the time we get to Election Day, you’re going to see full-fledged violent intimidation and civil rights abuses by these leftist socialists backed by the Obama administration against a mostly older conservative America that’s coming out to vote.”

Gheen continued, “You’re going to see, remember the Black Panthers trying to intimidate people with nightsticks outside the precinct in Philadelphia? You’re gonna see that times two hundred in thousands of locations across the country. They’re going to deploy the Black Panthers and the illegal aliens and all these people to get in people’s faces outside of polls, and it’s probably gonna lead to violence, violence initiated by the socialist rabble-rousers on CNN, including Don Lemon and everybody else who’s been on there pumping out lies for the last several years.”

Glenn Beck Says $400 Million Payment To Iran Is 'Much Worse' Than The Iran-Contra Scandal

Like so many other uninformed right-wing commentators, Glenn Beck is predictably outraged by a report that the United States sent $400 million in cash to Iran earlier this year, declaring on his radio program today that this transfer is "much worse" than the Iran-Contra scandal and that President Obama and Hillary Clinton will now have blood on their hands if any of that money is used to finance terrorist operations.

As we noted yesterday, this transfer was announced by the State Department back in January and openly reported on at the time and stemmed from the settlement of a dispute between the U.S. and Iran over undelivered weapons dating back to 1979. But conservative commentators don't care about the basic facts of the matter and are, instead, falsely claiming that the transfer was a ransom paid by the U.S. for the release of several American hostages being held by Iran.

Beck is convinced that this payment was made in cash so as to make it "untraceable" so that it can be used by Iran to finance Islamic terrorism around the world, thereby making it far worse than the Iran-Contra scandal.

Iran-Contra may have been illegal, Beck said, but it was carried out to further American interests and was therefore "a very pro-American thing to do," whereas "this is the president breaking the law, giving our tax dollars, $400 million in cash, to a terrorist state."

"Terrorism that is sponsored by Iran will be on the hands of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton because they're paying for it," Beck declared, seemingly oblivious to the fact that Clinton left the State Department back in 2013, three years before this payment was made. "Any time there is a terrorist you can trace back to Iran who is walking around with money in his pocket, you can thank Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. Period!"

President Trump? President Clinton? Either One Ends With Glenn Beck In Jail

On Tuesday night, Glenn Beck appeared on "Tomi," the nightly political commentary program hosted by Tomi Lahren that airs on Beck's The Blaze network, to promote his latest book, which is rather ironically titled "Liars: How Progressives Exploit Our Fears for Power and Control." 

During the discussion, Beck asserted that it doesn't really matter, at least for him, whether Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton gets elected in November because he'll wind up in jail under either one.

Under a Clinton presidency, Beck said, "I think we're looking at Argentina, I think we're looking at Evita," while under a Trump presidency, "we're looking at Mussolini."

America is facing the choice between a fascist dictator with Trump or a communist one with Clinton, Beck said he told his daughters recently, and "either one of those end with dad in jail."

John Birch Society Continues Comeback With Values Voter Summit Sponsorship

The Values Voter Summit, the annual event that brings together social conservatives and GOP politicians, has welcomed the far-right John Birch Society to sponsor a booth at the event’s exhibit hall this year, according to a list on the event’s website.

JBS has long been at least nominally exiled from the conservative mainstream thanks to its history of paranoia and racism, but has recently begun to get a toehold in some conservative establishment events. The group was allowed to sponsor a table at the annual Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) in 2010 but was booted from the event in 2012 amidst criticism.

As the Southern Poverty Law Center wrote in 2013, “Once considered by the right and the left as the political equivalent of an addled uncle sent down to the basement rec room to drink, rant and hopefully pass out before saying anything too nutty in front of the guests, in recent years the John Birch Society has been invited back upstairs and has even hosted a dinner party or two.”

JBS is probably best known for its decades-long obsession with fighting the communist infiltration of America, at one point even accusing President Dwight Eisenhower of being a communist agent. The group is still fighting what it sees as stealth communist infiltration, but in a different form; JBS CEO Arthur Thompson told SPLC in 2013, “While we’re sitting here proclaiming communism is dead, it’s growing everywhere and rapidly. It’s flourishing under different names, like the Muslim Brotherhood.”

SPLC provides some highlights of JBS’s troubling history:

Charges of racism and anti-Semitism have dogged the John Birch Society since its earliest days. It opposed civil rights legislation in the 1960s, saying the African-American freedom movement was being manipulated from Moscow with the goal of creating a “Soviet Negro Republic” in the Southern United States. The society was a close ally of Alabama’s segregationist governor George Wallace and reportedly had 100 chapters in and around Birmingham, Alabama’s largest city, as well as chapters across the rest of the state. Thompson, the group’s CEO, said the society has never been either racist or anti-Semitic, going so far as to add that once a member is discovered to harbor such views he or she is immediately “booted out.’’

In 2009, Rachel Maddow went into depth on the group’s record, including its opposition to public water fluoridation. More recently, JBS’s magazine, The New American, published an article that blamed the Sandy Hook elementary school shooting on “the assault on white men” in America that includes offenses from “‘affirmative action’ to massive Third World immigration.”

The Values Voter Summit, hosted by the Family Research Council and sponsored by the American Family Association, American Values and others, is the premier social conservative event of the year and often attracts leading GOP politicians, including presidential candidates. Now, along with mingling with some of the most extreme anti-gay, anti-choice and Christian nationalist activists in the country, these politicians will now be standing side-by-side with the John Birch Society.

Donald Trump: 'We've Got To Stop Being The Stupid Country Run By Very Stupid People'

At a rally yesterday in Daytona Beach, Florida, Donald Trump said that calls from politicians like Hillary Clinton to accept Syrian refugees in the U.S. prove that the country has become stupid: “We can’t take it. We can’t take it. We’ve got to stop being the stupid country run by very stupid people. We’ve got to stop. We’ve got to stop.”

Trump later recounted a story about a Democratic friend who is “seriously wrong about things” who decided to support him — “We’re gonna have a lot of switch. We’re gonna have a lot of people switching over” — because of the future of the Supreme Court.

He said conservatives “have no choice” but “to go for me” in order to prevent Clinton from nominating justices to the Supreme Court, saying that he plans to appoint justices in the mold of Antonin Scalia and hopefully pick “more justices than any president has ever picked in one term.”

“If Hillary puts her people on the Supreme Court, like, who knows, Elizabeth Warren may go, maybe —Pocahontas, Pocahontas, they’ll put Pocahontas. What an insult to Pocahontas, isn’t it? I apologize, ladies and gentlemen, to Pocahontas,” he said. “She will put people so far left that our country will become Venezuela. Big version. Venezuela. Believe me.”

He also went on his usual riff complaining that the cameramen covering his events only show his face, not the crowd — a policy established by his campaign.

Ann Coulter: Democrats Want To 'Make America Muslim'

During Khizr Khan’s speech at the Democratic National Convention, Ann Coulter blasted him as an “angry Muslim with a thick accent” and attacked his wife Ghazala for having “stood submissively in a hijab by husband’s side.”

Coulter kept the attacks coming in a column yesterday, once again smearing Khizr for his “thick Pakistani accent” and Ghazala as “a mute, hijab-wearing wife,” while stating that the DNC attendees were clamoring to “Make America Muslim.”

She said the Khans are nothing but “human shields liberals send out to defend their heinous policies” and alluded to her past attacks on a group of 9/11 widows, whom she had called “people enjoying their husbands’ death.”

The conservative provocateur somehow linked Khan’s speech about his son’s death to the debate over the Confederate flag.

Khizr Khan, the Muslim “Gold Star Father” who harangued Americans at the Democratic National Convention, with a mute, hijab-wearing wife at his side, is just another in a long string of human shields liberals send out to defend their heinous policies. The “Jersey Girls” were the classic example, first described in that magnificent book “Godless: The Church of Liberalism.”

In order to shut down a debate they’re losing, Democrats find victims to make their arguments for them, pre-empting counter-argument by droning on about the suffering of their victim-spokesperson. Alternative opinions must be preceded by proof that the speaker has “sacrificed” more than someone who lost a child, a husband, or whatever.

Khan’s argument, delivered angrily and in a thick Pakistani accent at the DNC, is that “our” Constitution requires us to continue the nonstop importation of Muslims.

If the U.S. Constitution required us to admit more than 100,000 Muslims a year – as we do – we’d already be living in Pakistan, and Khan wouldn’t have had to move to get that nice feeling of home. So the “argument” part of Khan’s point is gibberish.

Luckily, Khan had Part Two: His son died in Iraq, whereas Donald Trump does not have a son who died in Iraq, so he can’t say anything.



In addition to the sudden appearance of honor killings, clitorectomies, hijabs and massive government frauds, Muslim immigrants have given us: The most devastating terrorist attack in world history, followed by terrorist attacks at Fort Hood, the Boston Marathon, a military recruiting center in Chattanooga, Times Square, Vaughan Foods in Oklahoma, San Bernardino and an Orlando nightclub, among other places.

We’ve admitted 2 million Muslims just since 9/11 – that’s more than had been admitted before 9/11. If we don’t make it 3 million, we’re monsters? May we ask how many Muslims Khan’s mystery Constitution requires – or is that out of bounds unless we had a child who died in Iraq?

Apparently, sending out a victim to make their argument was the only option left for the “Make America Muslim!” crowd.



Muslim troops accounted for 0.2 percent of all U.S. troop deaths in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Southerners accounted for 38 percent of those killed in Iraq and 47 percent in Afghanistan.

What has South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley “sacrificed” compared to the families of these men? How about Nikki put their flag back up?

The Confederate flag won’t lead to thousands of dead and maimed Americans, as Muslim immigration does. The only danger posed by the Confederate flag is that media elites will hold the South in even greater contempt than they already do, assuming that’s possible.

But as long as they brought it up, if only people who lost children in our wars may discuss public policy, then only they should vote, not only on how many more Muslim immigrants this country needs, but on all government policies. What has Chuck Todd sacrificed? Have any current members of the New York Times editorial board ever lost a son in war? (Fighting on the American side.)

The inevitable conclusion to the hysteria over Khan is that only those who have worn the uniform and heard shots fired in anger can vote in our elections. Hello, media? Hey – where’d everybody go?

Sam Rohrer: Having Women In Positions Of Political Leadership Is A 'Mark Of Judgment' Upon A Nation

Earlier this week, the American Pastors Network dedicated its daily "Stand in the Gap" radio program to discussing the question of whether it is "biblical to have women in positions of government," during which APN board member Gary Dull argued that women should not be elected to such positions because it is "very clear in the scripture that a woman should not be in authority over men."

Yesterday, APN president Sam Rohrer appeared on TheDove TV's "Focus Today" program to discuss the issue, where he provided a more "enlightened" answer to this question by insisting that while it's not necessarily unbiblical for women to hold positions of political authority, it is a sign that a society is under God's judgment. 

Like Dull, Rohrer cited a verse from Isaiah 3 declaring that "youths oppress my people, women rule over them" when a nation is under judgment to assert that having women in leadership positions is "a mark of judgment" upon a nation.

"It was a mark of the lack of male leadership in positions to which God had called them," he said. "They rejected who God was, they departed, walking away from him — and I think we can draw the parallels to our country, obviously ... When that happens, [leaders] become tyrants or oppressors and God said, 'And women shall be rulers over you.' And that's where a lot of the context comes from, that that's an anathema." 

"God does raise up women," Rohrer said, "there is no question about it, but the real condemnation is not the women in office, the condemnation is the disregard and the absolute inability for male leadership to perform as God intended it and I believe that that's the application for us now."

Joseph Farah Hints Obama Might Not Leave Office If Trump Is Elected

Continuing in his news organization’s long history of promoting conspiracy theories by “ just asking the question,” WorldNetDaily editor Joseph Farah yesterday took it upon himself to ask “the obvious question no one’s asking Obama”: Will the president leave office if Donald Trump is elected?

Farah speculates that the president’s recent criticism of Trump may indicate a plan to ignore the Constitution and maintain power even after November’s election. While Farah claims that Obama’s recent comments about Trump’s fitness to serve as president are responsible for his third-term fears, this is far from the first time he or his outlet have speculated that the president will attempt to stay in office past January 2017.

It’s clear Obama has no use for Donald Trump. But that’s not really the point here.

Like it or not, and I don’t like it, Obama is the sitting president of the United States until Jan. 20, 2017.

The question this harsh, unprecedented attack by a sitting president on a major-party nominee to succeed him raises should be obvious: What happens if Donald Trump wins the election in November?

Given what Obama has said about Trump, would he not have an obligation to prevent Trump from assuming office? And what would that mean to the peaceful process America has enjoyed for more than two centuries of transitions of power?

These are questions Americans have never before been confronted with in American history.

Should we not be concerned about what Obama might do?

Should he not be asked pointedly about the implications of his stunning statements?

Should he not express exactly what his intentions are beforehand rather than to leave any doubt in the minds of the people?

If no one else will ask the question, I will: “Mr. President, if Donald Trump wins the election to become the next president of the United States, will you willingly and peacefully leave office and cooperate fully with the transition of power the way all of your predecessors in the White House have done in the past?”

It’s a simple question that needs to be asked and answered – given Obama’s highly inflammatory rhetoric over the last week.

There should be no doubt in the minds of the American people. There should be no veiled threats hanging over the heads of the citizenry as we prepare for the next election. It’s time for Obama to lay his cards on the table.

Will America follow the rule of law and the will of the people after the November election no matter what Obama might think about his successor?

Linda Harvey Blames Child Suicide And Mental Illness On Pro-LGBT, Pro-Choice Liberals

On the radio show “From the Median” last week, Linda Harvey of the anti-gay group Mission America blamed anxiety, depression and suicide attempts among children on “radical liberals” who teach children that “sexually deviant lifestyles and behaviors and Planned Parenthood” are “good and right.”

While Harvey admitted that Republicans aren’t “angels,” she said she “cannot understand how any thinking person could support the Democratic Party these days.”

“They simply do not seem to care about the unborn or the born children in their futures,” Harvey said. “They think that — they’re very in favor of all sorts of sexually deviant lifestyles and behaviors and Planned Parenthood and, you know, justifying all of this and that these are all good and right things. These are destructive, harmful, and evil things, and children are suffering greatly. The instability, the insecurity, the anxiety, the depression, the suicide attempts can, I think, so many of them, be laid at the feet of these radical liberals who push all kinds of programs and force all this on kids so early.”

Harvey urged parents to “keep up with this” since their children are being harmed.

Harvey also claimed that far from condoning homosexuality, the Bible “is a thoroughly heterosexual book.”

“There’s no example of a homosexual relationship in Scripture, there is no example of homosexuality ever being approved,” she said.

“When people say, ‘Oh, there’s only about 11 Bible verses throughout the Bible,’ no, there’s tons of other verses that, by implication, just exclude homosexuality, and the ones that do talk about it, it’s like, are you kidding me, you know?” Harvey said. “It’s an abomination. It’s completely against the way that God created. And it goes back to a creation issue, if you believe in God as Creator and that he distinctly decided, when he was thinking about humans, made us male and female, there is a reason for that and it’s like wearing pairs of clothes that are way too large or way too small.

“When you grasp who you are as God created you, you suddenly have much more sense of security, integrity, and many things begin to make more sense, and that’s one of the places people start when you’re trying to overcome somebody’s sexual confusion issues, and I think that’s where we’re at. You open people up to everything, and you get everything.”

FLASHBACK: Mike Pence Delivers Entire Speech Denying Evolution

In a widely posted interview with MSNBC’s Chris Matthews from 2009, Republican vice presidential nominee Mike Pence refused to say whether or not he believed in evolution. While Pence dodged the question in 2009, previously the answer was an emphatic no — he does not believe in the theory of evolution.

In 2002, Pence delivered an entire speech in the House of Representatives on the subject. “I believe that God created the known universe, the earth and everything in it, including man,” Pence told his colleagues. “And I also believe that someday scientists will come to see that only the theory of intelligent design provides even a remotely rational explanation for the known universe.”

Pence went to the floor to discuss the discovery of a skull from Sahelanthropus tchadensis, “one of the oldest known species in the human family tree.” He attempted to use this discovery to cast doubt on the entire theory of evolution. While there are still questions being raised about where this discovery fits on the evolutionary spectrum, whether the skull came from a common ancestor of humans and chimpanzees or a direct descendent of humans, the skull did not throw the case for natural selection into doubt.

In his speech Pence also deployed the old Creationist canard of confusing the scientific definition of the word “theory” with its common usage. “The truth is it always was a theory, Mr. Speaker. And now that we have recognized evolution as a theory, I would simply and humbly ask, can we teach it as such and can we also consider teaching other theories of the origin of species?” Pence asked before continuing to push Creationism as an equally scientifically viable alternative. “Like the theory that was believed in by every signer of the Declaration of Independence. Every signer of the Declaration of Independence believed that men and women were created and were endowed by that same Creator with certain unalienable rights. The Bible tells us that God created man in his own image, male and female. He created them. And I believe that, Mr. Speaker.”

While it seems silly to have to point this out, as the National Academy of Science notes, “The formal scientific definition of theory is quite different from the everyday meaning of the word. It refers to a comprehensive explanation of some aspect of nature that is supported by a vast body of evidence.”

The NAS also points out:

Many scientific theories are so well-established that no new evidence is likely to alter them substantially. For example, no new evidence will demonstrate that the Earth does not orbit around the sun (heliocentric theory), or that living things are not made of cells (cell theory), that matter is not composed of atoms, or that the surface of the Earth is not divided into solid plates that have moved over geological timescales (the theory of plate tectonics). Like these other foundational scientific theories, the theory of evolution is supported by so many observations and confirming experiments that scientists are confident that the basic components of the theory will not be overturned by new evidence. However, like all scientific theories, the theory of evolution is subject to continuing refinement as new areas of science emerge or as new technologies enable observations and experiments that were not possible previously.

Mike Pence might have been cautious with his words when questioned by Chris Matthews in 2009, but in 2002 his answer was clear. He was so dedicated to the cause of Creationism he gave an entire speech on the subject. It should come as no surprise that a politician who denied the dangers of tobacco would not believe in basic science.

 

Bryan Fischer: $400 Million Payment To Iran Is 'Our Sharia Compliant President Paying A Jizya Tax'

Conservative politicians and commentators are outraged today by a report that the United States sent $400 million in cash to Iran earlier this year on the day that Iran released four American hostages that it had been holding, falsely claiming that the payment was essentially a ransom paid to the Islamic republic.

In reality, the payment was part of a settlement over hundreds of millions of dollars in weapons that Iran had purchased from the U.S. prior to the overthrow of the Shah in 1979 but which were subsequently never delivered when diplomatic relations between the two nations were severed.

This was openly announced by the State Department back in January and even mentioned in news reports about the release of the hostages on the same day. 

But American Family Radio host Bryan Fischer obviously doesn't care about the simple truth of the matter and instead used it as an excuse to attack President Obama for supposedly paying a jizya submission tax to Iran on his radio show today.

"Basically, he's being Sharia compliant here," Fischer said. "Our president is a fan of the Islamic faith, he's a Muslim sympathizer and one of the doctrines of Islam is that if you are an infidel nation, you must pay a submission tax. It's called jizya ... What this is is a jizya tax. Our Sharia compliant president paying a jizya tax, a submission tax to an Islamic government."

Glenn Beck's Current Caliphate: Russia Is Trying To Collapse America And Foment Revolution

For the last week, Glenn Beck has been laying out his latest convoluted theory about what is "really" going on with the Russian hack and suspected leak of documents from the Democratic National Committee, which he summarized last night on Fox News by explaining that "Russia is trying to take down Hillary Clinton, destabilize our election and foment revolution on our streets."

On his radio program today, Beck begged his audience to heed his warning because he supposedly has an amazing record of making accurate predictions and he has the same feeling about this theory as he had about his warning of a coming caliphate.

"We have a pretty decent record on some pretty big things," Beck said. "I feel a growing sense that I — and I don't know if this is right yet, so take it with a grain of salt — but I'm beginning to believe that this is the same kind of ... I'm feeling the same way I did at the beginning the caliphate prediction, if you will, that it's the same kind of thing, that people are going to dismiss it and I need to warn you about this."

Russia is "trying to collapse" America "into revolution by going after Hillary Clinton, the DNC and our confidence in the election process," Beck warned. "Now we can either choose to pay attention to it and prepare and have hope in the future because we are not burying our heads in the sand or we can eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die. It's our choice. This program is going to cover this in the coming weeks and months and we're going to be prepared for whatever might come out way, God forbid that it does."

Sandy Rios Wonders If The Khans Thought Their Son Died An Apostate

Continuing her smear campaign against Khizr and Ghazala Khan, Sandy Rios of the American Family Association told Alan Colmes yesterday that the Khans may have been disappointed that their son served in the U.S. Army, making him an apostate from Islam when he died.

Rios falsely claimed that Khizr Khan has called Sharia law superior to the U.S. Constitution, claiming that since he “adheres to Sharia,” he would then “absolutely” want to kill Americans. (She appears to be citing an article which, as the myth-busting group Snopes points out, “in no part suggested support for Sharia law or membership in the Muslim Brotherhood and appeared to be an academic piece, not an advocacy paper.”)

After citing the so-called Islamic State’s assertion that the Khans’ son was an “apostate,” Rios said that the Khans may agree with the terrorist group’s assertion: “I believe that they believe that anyone that adheres to Sharia believes their son is an apostate for serving in the American military.”

“He’s an apostate according to Islamic Sharia law,” she said.

Right-Wing Pastor: Clinton Willing To Destroy America For Power

On Friday’s edition of “Trunews” with Rick Wiles, Georgia pastor Benjamin Faircloth claimed that if elected, Hillary Clinton “would have no problem setting this nation on fire” and would attempt to expand her authority just as Turkish President Recep Erdoğan has consolidated power following an attempted coup.

“Turkey, what’s happening there, Pastor Rick, is going to happen here in America,” Faircloth said, arguing that Erdoğan staged the coup in order “to take total control, if you will, and be a dictator over that nation.”

“To me, what it does is it shows us a parallel, it shows us an overlay, it shows us what’s coming to this nation,” Faircloth said. “If they can’t win by the ballot box, if they can’t win by, you know, fair, free elections, there is no doubt in my mind that same scare, that same type of entity here in America will pull the trigger and destroy this nation. If they can’t do it the way they wanna do it, I think that they will pull the trigger.”

“They want to shut you up,” Faircloth continued. “They’re ready to shut you up. They’re ready to shut all of us up, and when Hillary becomes president, that’s gonna be one of their main goals. You have to silence those who are in opposition of you, and that’s exactly what’s happening in Turkey right now.”

“If Hillary Clinton wins the White House, what you think the spiritual and political climate will be in this country?” Wiles asked.

“Well, first of all, Pastor, is how does she get in?” Faircloth responded. “If she gets in by just rigging the election and everything seems to be, you know, somewhat peaceful, I think she could stretch this thing out, but if it’s in anarchy, if it’s in complete chaos already, there’s no telling what’s in her heart. I think her heart is black, I think it’s evil.”

Faircloth claimed that when Clinton talked about the American Revolution during her Democratic National Convention speech, he “saw a change in her face.”

“I saw a change in her old demeanor and attitude, and I think that she would have no problem setting this nation on fire to get their goals completed,” Faircloth said.

Wiles alleged that Clinton wants a second revolution in the U.S., this time against Christianity.

“What she’s saying is we have reached a point where we can eradicate the old America that started after the first revolution,” Wiles said.

Kris Kobach Is Tired Of Being 'Lectured About Our Constitution' By 'Aliens'

Kris Kobach, the Kansas secretary of state and informal immigration adviser to Donald Trump, responded this weekend to the controversy over Trump’s feud with Gold Star parents Ghazala and Khizr Khan and to the presence of undocumented immigrants at the Democratic National Convention by saying, “It is maddening to be lectured about our Constitution and about what American law should be by aliens in the United States.”

On his weekly radio program on Kansas City’s KCMO, Kobach took a call from a listener named Sarah who claimed that Khan, in his speech to the Democratic convention, lied about Trump’s call to ban Muslims from immigrating to the U.S., saying that Trump just “wanted to vet them.” (Trump’s own words show that Khan was correct.)

“Well, it’s amazing how the left tries to distort what he says,” Kobach responded. “But the bottom line is he’s voicing a concern that many Americans have that we are letting into the United States radicalized Muslims from high-risk areas.”

The caller said that those radicalized Muslims are “already here, some of them,” citing the murder of a priest in France.

“You know,” Sarah continued, in an apparent reference to Khan’s DNC speech, “I am tired also of foreigners coming in our country and telling us what our Constitution says. We have a Constitution that empowers us and states we must maintain our borders in a sensible, enlightened, civilized way. We are not allowed to let anyone in and it’s against the law to do that because this is against the sanity and order of society. Any sane person of average intelligence should be able to figure this out, but our Constitution, they should learn the Constitution.”

“It is maddening to be lectured about our Constitution and about what American law should be by aliens in the United States,” Kobach agreed.

“My ancestors came here in the 1600s, I think I know a little bit about what it’s all about here,” Sarah interjected.

“Well, you know,” Kobach said, “I think the worst is what happens regularly in Topeka, where illegal aliens come in and lecture the legislators on why they need to continue getting in-state tuition. And we saw it at the DNC, when they bring illegal aliens on the stage. It’s just unbelievable.”

Linda Harvey: America Will 'Bleed To Death' Under 'Jezebel' Hillary Clinton

In her WorldNetDaily column yesterday, Linda Harvey of Mission America warned that electing Hillary Clinton as president will be a stab at the heart of this once-great nation,” predicting that the country will “bleed to death on her watch” and people will be thrown in jail for expressing “Christian views on homosexual behavior.”

Other countries should also fear a Clinton presidency, Harvey said, as she would promote “the diabolical cause of normalizing homosexual conduct worldwide.”

“Fascism continued and extended under a modern-day Jezebel,” she said. “America can do far better than Hillary. Please, if you claim to love the Lord Jesus, do not help elect this corrupt woman.”

Everything in Hillary Clinton’s track record screams the opposite: arrogance, lawlessness, bald-faced deception, alliance with sexual depravity, injustice, greed, unaccountability, godlessness, treason.

The white suit worn during her DNC acceptance speech cannot hide the bloodstains in Hillary’s life. As with Lady Macbeth, those stains are increasingly difficult to wash off.

Hillary’s election as president will be a stab at the heart of this once-great nation. We may bleed to death on her watch, but she either won’t see or won’t care.



In Hillary’s upside-down ethical world, sodomy and gender rebellion are “human rights.” Our children will be further corrupted as Hillary twists the notion U.S. civil rights law into including male/male or female/female sexual behavior, and ramps up the Obama pressure on public schools to deceive children with deviant “LGBTQ” propaganda. Her Departments of Education and Justice are likely to continue the phony interpretation of Title IX allowing privacy-free, open sex bathrooms.

But this deviance-fest won’t end at the U.S border. Under Hillary’s tenure as secretary of state, a State Department fund was set up to finance the diabolical cause of normalizing homosexual conduct worldwide, even in nations with strong cultural or religious objections. Diplomatic pressure has been exerted, and U.S. aid has been withheld, depending on a nation’s accommodation of this goal. As president, she will accelerate this coercion, and as the DNC platform states, “We will continue to stand with LGBT people around the world, including fighting efforts by any nation to infringe on LGBT rights or ignore abuse.”

Let’s all remember that the liberal definition of “abuse” includes verbal objections – free speech – by private citizens about homosexual behavior. The left, now led by Hillary, is committed to silencing the opposition. Christians, who learn through Scripture that homosexuality is an abomination and no human needs to engage in this conduct, must recognize what’s unfolding here.

Even in America, people who express Christian views on homosexual behavior are now being jailed. Just ask Kim Davis.



So there you have it. Fascism continued and extended under a modern-day Jezebel. America can do far better than Hillary.

Please, if you claim to love the Lord Jesus, do not help elect this corrupt woman.

Frank Gaffney: Khizr Khan Wants To Promote Sharia Law

Unsurprisingly, Frank Gaffney is joining the right-wing smear campaign against Khizr Khan, alleging in an interview today with Breitbart News that Khan is “lying for the faith” and “absolutely” wants to install Sharia law in the U.S. Of course, there is no evidence of this other than a bogus blog post by a pair of extremist activists and a Breitbart article linking Khan to a law firm that has ties to Saudi Arabia … and also to Donald Trump.

Gaffney also played defense for Trump by claiming that the GOP presidential candidate is merely trying to prevent “jihadists” from entering the country.

However, Trump has advocated for a sweeping ban on all Muslims from entering the U.S., and even cited a discredited poll conducted by Gaffney’s Center for Security Policy to justify his blanket ban.

Walid Shoebat: Khizr Khan Was Practicing Muslim Tradition Of 'Deception'

Walid Shoebat, the anti-Muslim activist whose recent article smearing Donald Trump critic Khizr Khan and his late son Humayun was hyped by Trump advisers on Twitter, spoke yesterday with St. Louis radio host Marc Cox, where he claimed that Khan’s speech to the Democratic National Committee was part of a Muslim tradition of “propaganda” and “deception” and suggested that Muslims who join the military, like Khan’s late son, do so in order to fight secular governments in the Middle East.

“So, these guys know how to speak,” he said of Khan. “We from the Middle East — I was a Muslim — we know propaganda since the U.S. was in diapers. We were there for a thousand-some years creating propaganda. So people need to understand, a bleeding-heart Muslim can cry in the TV and can lure millions. They know what they’re doing. And so it’s called ‘taqiyya al-muruna.’ People need to look up ‘Muslim Brotherhood muruna,’ they need to understand those concepts of deception, but they don’t. They simply think that if his son died in Iraq, that means this man is a patriot.”

“Well, many Muslims joined the military in Iraq and Syria, they joined to fight the secular governments,” he continued. “To the Islamist mindset, the U.S. is doing a service for the Islamist cause. Look at the Iraq today. What’s happening? It’s about to become Iran. Look at Syria: the ousting of Bashar al-Assad, for what? Why did we oust Muammar al-Qaddafi? Today Hillary Clinton is bombing ISIS in Libya. Wasn’t she the one that went to England and France and urged the whole world to bomb Muammar al-Qaddafi? Wasn’t it Huma Abedin who showed the photo of Muammar al-Qaddafi with a stick in his anus and she was laughing?

“I mean, excuse me, who removed all these secular governments in the Middle East? Who? And who is doing the work for the Islamists? The United States military. So is a U.S. soldier serving his country? That’s what he thinks, and he’s naïve. He’s serving a political agenda of Obama and Hillary Clinton.”

Syndicate content