All

Beck: My 'Restoring Honor' Speech Could Have Saved The Nation 'If America Would Have Listened To It'

After comparing Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress this morning to the biblical book of Esther, Glenn Beck declared on his radio program today that Netanyahu's speech was the most important one given since the one that Beck delivered at his "Restoring Honor" event on the National Mall back in 2010.

"Have you ever seen a speech that hasn't been given get this much attention?" Beck asked. "The last speech I saw get this much attention before it was given was 8/28."

Beck went on to claim that his 8/28 speech would have changed the course of the world "if America would have listened to it."

Sadly, the nation didn't listen, Beck said, but he knows that he still accomplished God's "desired outcome."

"I do believe it did change the course with many people," Beck said. "It had its desired outcome, I believe, for the Lord":

Sandy Rios: Migrant Kids Spread Disease Because They Don't Know 'How To Go To The Bathroom Properly'

On her radio program this morning, the American Family Association’s Sandy Rios claimed once again that young immigrants are responsible for a recent outbreak of Enterovirus D68, even though health experts have found that there is no link between immigrants and the debilitating illness. After reading a Washington Post story about the illness that didn’t mention any connection with immigration, Rios went ahead and suggested that Central American children who “were shuttled to unknown place around the country” spread Enterovirus D68 to other kids.

Rios backed up this assertion by claiming that immigrant children don’t have any basic understanding of hygiene and are largely unvaccinated, despite the fact that Central Americans have a higher vaccination rate than U.S. youth. She even claimed that the kids don’t even know how to use the bathroom.

“We have vaccinations and hygiene and cleanliness and we teach people in western civilization how to go to the bathroom properly, how to take care of things, how to do things in a sanitary way,” Rios said. “Do you not think that when we open our borders to a glut of people from another world who have never been trained, don’t know that, that that’s not going to bring in disease?”

Walid Shoebat Warns Radical Islam Leads To Gay Rights And Cannibalism

Walid Shoebat, a right-wing activist and frequent Fox News guest who has built his career around the questionable claim that he is an “ex-terrorist,” told Alaska politician and radio host Joe Miller in an interview last week that Islamists in the Middle East are seeking to introduce an anti-Christian tyranny that will ultimately “bring in homosexual rights” and “rights to cannibalism” because “that’s how tyrannies work.”

“The Islamification process is not just the idea of making it difficult for Christians like you see in the Palestinian arena,” he told Miller.

“Now it’s really transforming into something more. In other words, tyranny begins at that stage, in which tyranny wants to basically bring in homosexual rights, pretty soon it will be rights to cannibalism, rights to polygamy, rights to [etc.] And that’s how tyrannies work. It’s not just Islamo-tyranny, but any tyranny, this is how it works,” he said.

Ben Carson: Net Neutrality Creates Government 'Control In The Private Lives Of Citizens'

Ben Carson, the conservative activist who announced today that he will be forming a presidential exploratory committee, spoke with David Brody at CPAC last week about his likely 2016 bid.

When Brody asked Carson for his views about “this whole F.C.C. net neutrality thing,” Carson gave a baffling response that seemed to have nothing to do with net neutrality, which ensures that internet service providers treat all internet content equally, as he suggested that the principle of the open internet somehow will lead to more secrecy and less privacy.

Carson told Brody that President Obama and others want to “impose another level of secrecy and control in the private lives of citizens” through net neutrality, arguing that officials should instead focus on “exploring ways to allow people to do what they want to do, they’ve been doing it for years, so why should we now impose a layer of government control.”

Joe Miller Fears Immigration Will Hurt 'Integrity' Of Population, Destroy Second Amendment

As we noted earlier, former GOP Alaska Senate candidate Joe Miller is launching a new chapter as a right-wing radio host, and recruited an all-star cast of activists to be guests on his show in its opening weeks. Miller set the tone for the program with his very first guest, prominent anti-immigration activist and Kansas secretary of state Kris Kobach, who discussed with Miller the “cultural damage” being done by high levels of immigration.

Miller lamented to Kobach that too many people “react with sympathy and empathy” to undocumented immigrants when really President Obama’s executive actions on immigration amount to “the destruction of a nation.”

“If you’ve got a country that doesn’t protect its borders, doesn’t protect the integrity of its people, what do we become?” he asked.

He added that immigration reform would endanger the Second Amendment because “there’s no concept of the Second Amendment in Mexico, people don’t have the right to have guns, they don’t understand the constitutional right here.”

Kobach picked up on the argument, fearing that since “our schools aren’t pushing American culture and our American creed anymore,” immigrants are failing to assimilate, resulting in both “economic damage” and “cultural damage.”

Klingenschmitt: Murder Of North Carolina Muslim Students Was An Anti-Christian Hate Crime

Last month, three young Muslims students were murdered in an apartment in North Carolina, in a crime allegedly stemming from a long-simmering dispute over parking. The man accused of committing the murders was reportedly an atheist who frequently posted anti-religious messages on his Facebook page.

Among the things he had posted on his Facebook page was an image asserting that despite their opposition to one another, "radical Christians" and "radical Muslims" actually hold similar ideological positions on a wide array of issues ... and because of that, Colorado state representative Gordon Klingenschmitt is convinced that these three Muslims were really killed "because they were like Christians."

Taking the Religious Right's persecution complex to its absurd conclusion, Klingenschmitt cited this particular Facebook post on his "Pray In Jesus Name" program today as proof that this "radical left-wing atheist who is going around killing people of faith ... killed these Muslims because they think like Christians":

Pat Robertson: Muslim Neighbors Want To Kill You; Obama Advancing Islam

Today on “The 700 Club,” Pat Robertson said that the Islamic world has largely embraced violent extremism “like a trigger went off” and “something activated this latent spirit in Islam.”

Robertson said that while Christians in the Middle East should love their Muslim neighbors, they must “be aware that they are trying to kill you.”

Earlier in the program, the televangelist repeated his frequent refrain that President Obama is aiding Islamic extremists, telling listeners that Obama has “a desire to somehow weaken America, weaken western power and build up Islam.”

“His action time and time again is favoring Islam and not favoring America and what we would call western democracy,” Robertson said.

Barber: Gay Marriage Will Be 'The Sledgehammer Used To Crush The Church'

On a recent episode of Liberty Counsel's "Faith and Freedom" radio program, Mat Staver and Matt Barber discussed the case of a Washington state florist who is facing fines for refusing to sell flowers to a same-sex couple for their wedding, which they used to warn that if the Supreme Court legalizes gay marriage this year, it will lead to widespread Christian persecution and the destruction of the Christian church in America.

Barber declared that the push for gay marriage was never about equality but rather "about forcing Christians against their will to celebrate deviant homosexual behavior."

"This was about persecuting Christians," he said, "not about marriage equality."

Staver readily agreed, saying that gay marriage is "an oxymoron" because "same-sex relationships are harmful, they're sinful, they're contrary to the Scriptures, they're contrary to the natural created order," and warning that gay activists are intent on persecuting Christians all over America, which promoted Barber to issue a dire warning.

"If, God forbid ... the Supreme Court somehow defines and manufactures a constitutional so-called right to sodomy-based marriage this summer, in June, if they do that then the floodgates will be open," Barber said. "There will be Christian persecution widespread across the United States and the so-called gay marriage agenda will be the sledgehammer used to crush the church and to crush religious liberty and the crush individual Christians, their finances, to ruin them. That's what this agenda was always about and that's what we will see if the Supreme Court goes the wrong way in June."

Staver closed by declaring that if the Supreme Court does rule in favor of gay marriage, then Christians must treat the ruling as illegitimate and ignore it:

WND Pundit: Net Neutrality Will Destroy The First Amendment, 'It's All Poop'

Tamara Colbert of Mama Grizzly Radio took to WorldNetDaily today to blast “Swami Obama” for his support for net neutrality, or as she calls it, “net brutality.”

Colbert, who seems completely unaware of the principle behind net neutrality, baselessly alleged that the Federal Communications Commission’s new rules will enable the government to “regulate speech on the Internet,” telling readers to “kiss the First Amendment goodbye, right behind the rest of the Constitution.”

Warning that net neutrality will help Obama “brutalize Americans” and transform “America into a socialist utopia no better than what Hugo Chavez did to Venezuela or Castro’s Cuba,” she wrote that Obama is acting like an abuser who beats his spouse in order “to control you.”

“It’s all poop – everything the federal government touches turns to poop – health care, airport security, education, the IRS, the EPA, the federal courts … and now the Internet,” Colbert said. “It’s time to stop the abuse and clean up the poop.”

Last week the FCC ruled in favor of Net Neutrality, which is anything but – according to the two opposing FCC commissioners who, dare I say, are heroes who tried to alert the public as to the tyranny once again about to be forced upon us for the sake of the greater good. Ajit Pai and Mike O’Reilly, the two Republican commissioners, said that these new rules will crush innovation, increases taxes and fees and finally give the FCC policing power over the Internet. This isn’t Net Neutrality; it’s net brutality!

What is more insidious, which many of us on the conservative side predicted, is that progressives see this as a victory enalbing [sic] them to now control and regulate speech on the Internet. Let the beatings continue, as we kiss the First Amendment goodbye, right behind the rest of the Constitution in the toilet of government-run anything. The most ironic and idiotic statement came from Commissioner Mignon Clyburn who said that America’s “Framers would be pleased” with the 332-page plan (to destroy the Internet).



The deception isn’t just Houdini sleight of hand, but that of an abuser – who lures you in with all the niceties and gifts for months of wooing, only to backhand you at the first chance he gets to remind you where your place is in his world. At first you’re shocked and try to justify that he was just tired; had a bad day; didn’t really mean it. You shake it off because the package looks so good, and everyone else thinks he’s wonderful, so you wonder if it’s “you.” That’s hope.

Before you know it, the emotional and physical abuse is spattered in between the gifts – which come less frequently now and typically get thrown at you, like scraps from the table, to keep you hanging by a sheer thread that everything is OK. Now your abuser thinks that you like the beatings because you don’t speak up. Your silence is a deafening seal of approval for his sadistic treatment of you, and from here things only get worse. He doesn’t really love you; he wants to control you. Here’s the change.

Net Neutrality is anything but neutral; it’s biased. Swami Obama and his administration are out to brutalize Americans – see how generous he has been with the wooing of America. He said a lot of things on the campaign trail in 2007 that hoodwinked many to fall in love with the concept of the first black president. Meanwhile, he is thinking, as most abusers do, that he just has to be nice and kind to gain control of the relationship.

Let’s face it: The American people who have supported Swami Obama are traumatized by being abused for more than six years and the progressive beat-down that lasted for another 90 years prior to Obama. The free stuff was there to get everyone hooked – free Internet, free phones, food stamps, affordable health care, unlimited unemployment benefits and free community college. When millions of Americans stood up to say “no” to the abuse, they got backhanded by the mainstream media, progressives on Capitol Hill (both sides of the aisle mind you) and Hollywood hacks, until they fell back in line, albeit a bit worse for wear, discouraged and demoralized. And just like magic, the swami didn’t have his hand on any of it. The scars from emotional abuse don’t leave fingerprints.

Net Neutrality is a major step in this screwed-up relationship to fully control an abused populace into believing that suddenly now everyone is going to have free Internet. Only now the Swami is gearing up for his last trick – he’s got less than two years to finish fundamentally transforming America into a socialist utopia no better than what Hugo Chavez did to Venezuela or Castro’s Cuba.



Seriously, does anyone think that the Thomas Edison light bulb or a toilet that used enough water to actually flush poop down was a direct threat to society? Seriously? I’m laughing as I write this because the key connection here is POOP. It’s all poop – everything the federal government touches turns to poop – health care, airport security, education, the IRS, the EPA, the federal courts … and now the Internet.

It’s time to stop the abuse and clean up the poop.

Former GOP Senate Candidate Joe Miller Reinvents Himself As Birther Radio Host

Joe Miller, who as the Tea-Party backed Republican Senate candidate in Alaska in 2010 was defeated by a write-in campaign for incumbent Lisa Murkowski, lost his second Senate bid last year and has now apparently decided to reinvent himself as a right-wing radio host.

Last month, Miller launched a radio program that is broadcast online and on a couple of stations in Alaska, and in his first few weeks managed to secure interviews with conservative activists including Gun Owners of America’s Larry Pratt, Ret. Major General Paul Vallely and Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach.

Signaling the ease with which he’s transitioning from a politician to a radio host, Miller also scored interviews with a number of prominent birthers, including WorldNetDaily’s Jerome Corsi, attorney Herb Titus and, of course, Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio, whom he thanked for his “admirable” ongoing effort to prove that the president’s birth certificate is a forgery.

Miller told Arpaio that he knows something’s not right with Obama’s record, falsely claiming that the president has spent “millions” to “protect his college records” and that “there’s really no dispute” that “his Selective Service registration card that’s been published is a forgery.”

He added that the media is enforcing a “double standard” in questioning why Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker left college before graduating. “You talk about a double standard. I mean, here you’ve got a media attacking Scott Walker because they don’t know why he left school the last year, and yet they don’t lift a finger on President Obama,” he said.

Arpaio agreed that the president’s background is so questionable that “I don’t think he would be hired in our office when you get right down to it,” and lamented that it’s “a little strange” that he’s the only one investigating the long-moot birth certificate issue.

“It is,” Miller responded. “And any time that you stand up and you say, hey, look, I’m going to stand for what’s right, you end up being the target on it. And the stand that you’ve taken, not just on that issue but on illegal aliens and the other issues you’re facing, are admirable.”