March 2007

States Turn Down Federal Abstinence-Only Funding

Wisconsin: Feds “made it very clear to the states they wanted abstinence-only education.”

Major Employers Worry Anti-Gay Marriage Amendment Will Hurt Recruitment

Eli Lilly concerned Indiana would be seen as intolerant; Focus calls this a “smoke screen.”

2008: GOP Candidates Race to Right on Economic Issues, Too

To “offset” social positions (temp link). E.g.: Steve Forbes endorses Giuliani.

Pennsylvania Anti-Gay Activist Decries Anti-Bullying Bill

Would “open the door” for “pro-homosexual organizations” in schools. Meanwhile: “Ex-gay” Stephen Bennett calls for mass hooky on “Day of Silence.”

Texas Activist Attacks 'Race for Cure' to End Breast Cancer

Linked to Planned Parenthood, warns Pro-Life Waco.

Book Your 'Patriot Pastor' 'Crusade' Now

Scarborough, Keyes plan road trip.

Bozell: 'Greatest Moment' in Media Research Center History Was 'Rathergate'

Group turns 20; ceremony redefines “roast.”

Janice Rogers Brown Warns Critics of Religious Right Seek 'Permanent Revolution' of 'Secular Humanism'

Federal Judge Janice Rogers Brown, a far-right nominee who was appointed to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals in 2005, recently spoke to students at Harding University in Arkansas. Brown, known for her strident legal views on the “socialist revolution” of Social Security and other topics, set her sights on critics of the Religious Right and our supposed “demands”:

Brown said those who attack the religious right “essentially argue (that) the true American religion demands acceptance of, indeed submission to, a common political vision — their vision.”

In the 20th century, secular humanism crept into American and Western governments, promising openness and tolerance for diverse groups, religions and philosophies, she said.

“What we got was narrow positivism, moral relativism and the totalitarian reign of the radical multiculturalist,” Brown said. “It promised peace. What we got was a process of permanent revolution, tumult, strife and a ceaseless assault upon the foundations of faith, family and civil society. It promised if not the pursuit of truth, at least rationality and acknowledgment of objective reality. What we got was postmodernism.” The battle, in her view, is not political but theological: “Contrary to the prevailing secularist dogma ... a society cannot exist without a fighting faith. Where society has nothing to die for, it has nothing to live for and cannot long survive.”

Brown is occasionally touted by the far Right as a future Supreme Court nominee.

When All Else Fails, Blame the Media

It looks as if James Dobson is trying to back away from his attack on possible GOP presidential nominee Fred Thompson. 

In an interview with US News and World Report’s Dan Gilgoff, Dobson recently attempted to throw cold water on Thompson's candidacy because, in Dobson words, he doesn't "think [Thompson is] a Christian."  Since then, the people at Focus on the Family have apparently realized that it is just this sort of thing that lends credence to Dick Armey’s accusation that “Dobson and his gang of thugs are real nasty bullies” and thus have decided to fight back the only way they know how: by blaming the media

In conclusion, we would caution friends of our ministry not to believe what they read about Dr. Dobson in the secular media today. Never in the 30-year history of this ministry has there been more reporting and outright distortion of his beliefs and teachings. It is apparent that those who represent a liberal worldview seek to marginalize him and confuse our friends. Anyone who ever has a question concerning what they read about Dr. Dobson or Focus on the Family is encouraged to contact us for clarification. The chances are they have been misinformed.

Gilgoff did not solicit Dobson’s view on this issue -- Dobson sought him out in order to undermine Thompson and praise Newt Gingrich. But now he isn’t happy with the results.

It should be noted that this is not the first time Dobson has been angry with the coverage he received in US News and World Report.  As Gilgoff explained in the introduction to his book - “The Jesus Machine: How James Dobson, Focus on the Family, and Evangelical America are Winning the Culture War” – he first interviewed Dobson following the 2004 election for an article about the influence of so-called “values voters.” A few weeks later, when Gilgoff was working on a follow-up piece, he tried to contact Dobson again only to be denied an interview request because Dobson was upset that he had only received one quote in Gilgoff’s previous article.  

But Gilgoff went to Focus on the Family headquarters anyway and eventually scored a second interview with Dobson:

At the end of my second day in Colorado Springs, however, Dobson’s aide told me that he might grant an interview the following morning, my last at Focus headquarters. Representatives from Focus’s media relations department had been sitting in on all of my interviews with Focus staff, and thought my questions were well informed, and, more important, unbiased. I had passed a crucial test.

Gilgoff then went on to write an entire book about Dobson and his empire -  a book which must not have displeased Dobson too greatly, considering that he hand-picked Gilgoff as his outlet for getting the word out about Thompson.  Yet once Gilgoff reported that Dobson had questioned the faith of a potential Republican presidential candidate while praising a thrice-married adulterer, FOF responded by alleging a grand conspiracy by which the “secular media” seeks to “marginalize [Dobson] and confuse our friends.” 

Despite Dobson’s accusations, US News is standing by its initial report, saying the “piece was accurate and representative of the spirit of Dobson's comments.”

Religious Right Claims Hate-Crimes Law an Attack on Christianity

With the reintroduction of the Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act in the House and the prospect that it may pass in a Democratic Congress, religious-right groups are waging a sizeable campaign to portray the bill as part of a mythical persecution of Christians. Although hate-crimes laws expand penalties for violent crimes causing bodily injury or death (as well as attempts through firearms and explosives), the Religious Right is labeling them “thought crimes” laws the “only effect” of which “is to gag people of faith.” Although federal law has punished hate crimes based on race for more than a decade, the Religious Right is incensed at the prospect of using the law to protect gays as well.

This reaction follows a pattern of asserting that gay rights – or a so-called “homosexual agenda” – will lead to the “repression” of religion in America, an anti-gay marketing effort typified by last year’s “Values Voter Summit” in Washington, where speakers from Mitt Romney to Tony Perkins claimed that, in the words of Alan Sears of the Alliance Defense Fund, “The homosexual agenda and [freedom of] religion are on a collision course.” “They know they must silence the church,” warned Perkins. At that time, the issue was same-sex marriage; the co-sponsor of the federal constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, Rep. Marilyn Musgrave (R-CO), said that “"If we have gay marriage, our religious liberties are gone!”