Top Navigation Contact Us Media Center Action Center Donate Membership PFAW Home Link Progressive Voice In the Courts On Capitol Hill In the States Who We Are PFAW Home Link
Send questions, comments and tips to rww@pfaw.org.




Topics
Anti-Gay
Budget & Taxes
Bush Administration
Censorship
Civil Liberties
Creationism
Culture War
Education
Elections
First Amendment
Immigration
In the States
Judiciary
Media
Miscellaneous
Politics
Race/Civil Rights
Religion
Religious Right
Reproductive Health
Right Wing
Science
Social Security
Voting


Links
More Right Wing Watch
Organizations on the Right
Pre-Blog News Archive


Archives
June 1, 2008 - June 7, 2008
May 25, 2008 - May 31, 2008
May 18, 2008 - May 24, 2008
May 11, 2008 - May 17, 2008
May 4, 2008 - May 10, 2008
April 27, 2008 - May 3, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008

Add to your feed reader RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo!
Click here to sign up for regular “best of the blog” e-mail updates.

Left navigation bar PFAW Home Public Education Religious Freedom Civil Rights & Equal Rights Constitutional Liberties Independent Judiciary Civic Participation

« Values Voter Summit: Is the Anti-Christ Gay? | Main | Values Voter Summit: Impressions, Day 2 »

September 24, 2006

Values Voter Summit: The Value of a Little Strategic Dishonesty

A Saturday workshop on “Getting Church Voters to the Polls” suggested that getting the right candidate elected is more important than being honest with fellow churchgoers.

What Connie Marshner of the Leadership Institute presented was not the kind of nonpartisan voter registration and civic participation campaign many churches appropriately carry out, but a step-by-step “Church Plan” to recruit volunteers and run a campaign to identify and turnout voters for a specific candidate.

The plan starts with a voter canvas – calling through the church directory to find out which candidate people are supporting, whether they’re registered, and how likely they are to vote. “It is absolutely essential that the initial phone contact with the voter be anonymous contact,” says the manual, explaining that if the person receiving the call knows the caller, they might say what they think the caller wants to hear.

Marshner and her manual suggest having the callers pretend that they are with a polling firm. Several attendees noted that when there was some discomfort in the room about the ethics of building the campaign on deceptive calls, and workshop attendees got no good answers to questions about how a caller should respond if asked how he or she got the person’s name and phone number, Marshner moved the conversation along.

The kind of campaign Marshner presented could not be carried out by a church without violating its tax status; her plan seems designed to skirt that problem by being carried out by church members as individuals. And, it was suggested, it might be better not to get the pastor involved. A little plausible deniability to be on the safe side.

Posted by Peter at 8:58 AM

Sign Up for Regular Email Updates of this Blog