Top Navigation Contact Us Media Center Action Center Donate Membership PFAW Home Link Progressive Voice In the Courts On Capitol Hill In the States Who We Are PFAW Home Link
Send questions, comments and tips to rww@pfaw.org.




Topics
Anti-Gay
Budget & Taxes
Bush Administration
Censorship
Civil Liberties
Creationism
Culture War
Education
Elections
First Amendment
Immigration
In the States
Judiciary
Media
Miscellaneous
Politics
Race/Civil Rights
Religion
Religious Right
Reproductive Health
Right Wing
Science
Social Security
Voting


Links
More Right Wing Watch
Organizations on the Right
Pre-Blog News Archive


Archives
June 1, 2008 - June 7, 2008
May 25, 2008 - May 31, 2008
May 18, 2008 - May 24, 2008
May 11, 2008 - May 17, 2008
May 4, 2008 - May 10, 2008
April 27, 2008 - May 3, 2008
April 20, 2008 - April 26, 2008
April 13, 2008 - April 19, 2008

Add to your feed reader RSS 2.0
Add to My Yahoo!
Click here to sign up for regular “best of the blog” e-mail updates.

Left navigation bar PFAW Home Public Education Religious Freedom Civil Rights & Equal Rights Constitutional Liberties Independent Judiciary Civic Participation

« Welcome to the Club | Main | Be Heroic, Just Like Me and Sen. Santorum »

July 27, 2006

The Right Just Likes to Fight

Robert Novak reports that the White House, Senate Republicans and their right-wing base are in disarray over the issue of judicial nominations.  

As Novak sums it up, “Despite recent nominations and confirmations, it seems too late for a Senate battle to impact the midterm campaign … No debate, no campaign issue.”

Driving home the point of just how important judges – or rather, fights over judges - are to the Right, Sean Rushton of the Committee for Justice took to the pages of the National Review to explicitly tell GOP leaders in the Senate that they has better start picking some fights over judges or face the consequences in November

This November will be the first election year since 2000 that no significant Senate debate over judicial confirmations will spark a voter response. If Senate leaders do not rethink their strategy, fewer voters will be considering judicial confirmations when they vote for Senate candidates on November 3rd. It is a huge mistake. It is an avoidable mistake.

There is nothing like a currently simmering controversy — in the nation’s great debating society, the U.S. Senate – to arouse voters anew. The judicial issue has shown its power not only to turn out conservative voters, but to swing moderates to the GOP, whether through appeal to unpopular rulings on private property rights, marriage, and “Under God” in the Pledge of Allegiance, or through simple disgust with Democratic obstruction and name calling. Judicial confirmation battles pay dividends.

Notice that Rushton doesn’t say “judicial confirmations pay dividends” – he says “judicial confirmation battles pay dividends.”

It is amazing really - getting controversial nominees confirmed is actually less of a priority for the Right than is merely starting a fight over the nominees.

Posted by Kyle at 4:45 PM

Sign Up for Regular Email Updates of this Blog